Scandal as Constructivation: Trust Cultures and the Politics of Legitimacy in Southeast Asia

This article theorizes political scandal in Southeast Asia as a performative and culturally embedded process rather than simple exposure of wrongdoing. Using the Dengvaxia vaccine controversy in the Philippines as a generative case, it introduces the concept of trust cultures: historically grounded and affectively charged frameworks through which publics evaluate credibility, sincerity, and moral authority. The analysis identifies three competing trust cultures—parental, technocratic, and journalistic—and examines how they interact through affective resonance, moral legibility, and narrative fit. These dynamics demonstrate that scandal is not merely revealed but performed, as competing actors stage claims to truth and legitimacy in ways that compel public interpretation. Extending beyond the Philippine case, the article proposes a Southeast Asian grammar of scandal marked by fragmented authority, affectively mobilized publics, and hybrid media environments. In doing so, it challenges liberal-democratic models and foregrounds cultural-political performance in understanding trust, legitimacy, and media power in the Global South.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scandal as Constructivation: Trust Cultures and the Politics of Legitimacy in Southeast Asia

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
article

Scandal as Constructivation: Trust Cultures and the Politics of Legitimacy in Southeast Asia

article en

Abstract

This article theorizes political scandal in Southeast Asia as a performative and culturally embedded process rather than simple exposure of wrongdoing. Using the Dengvaxia vaccine controversy in the Philippines as a generative case, it introduces the concept of trust cultures: historically grounded and affectively charged frameworks through which publics evaluate credibility, sincerity, and moral authority. The analysis identifies three competing trust cultures—parental, technocratic, and journalistic—and examines how they interact through affective resonance, moral legibility, and narrative fit. These dynamics demonstrate that scandal is not merely revealed but performed, as competing actors stage claims to truth and legitimacy in ways that compel public interpretation. Extending beyond the Philippine case, the article proposes a Southeast Asian grammar of scandal marked by fragmented authority, affectively mobilized publics, and hybrid media environments. In doing so, it challenges liberal-democratic models and foregrounds cultural-political performance in understanding trust, legitimacy, and media power in the Global South.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Polytechnic University of the Philippines (PH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.