DP124 | CHARACTERISTICS, OUTCOMES AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS RECEIVING ASCIMINIB IN BOLOGNA

Asciminib (asc), an allosteric inhibitor, is an effective and safe option for patients (pts) in late and early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In Italy, outside of clinical trials, in April 2019 asc became available through a Managed Access Program approved by Novartis for pts resistant or intolerant (R/I) to ≥2 tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) without T315I mutation; since August 2024 it has been approved for commercial use by AIFA. We report our single-center experience of asc use as per clinical practice. We retrospectively collected data of 21 CML pts treated with asc in our Institute between November 2020 and November 2024. Most pts were elderly with a median age of 71 (range 37-90) years and with multiple comorbidities (57% had CCI >4), including cardiovascular ones (86%). The median number of prior TKIs were 3 (2-4); only 5 pts (24%) were ponatinib (pona)-exposed. Switch to asc occurred for sole intolerance in 9 pts (43%) and for resistance in 12 (57%) At baseline, 55% of pts had BCR::ABL1<sup>IS</sup> >1%; 20% of pts had major molecular response (MMR) or better. After 25 months of median follow-up and duration of therapy, most pts (81%) remained on asc. Reason for discontinuation was resistance (n=2) and death (n=2; 1 progressed to myeloid blast crisis, MBC). The cumulative incidence (CI) of MR2 at 12, 24 and 48 weeks was 18%, 64% and 82%, respectively; the CI of MMR was 13%, 44% and 50%, respectively. Overall, 80% of pts improved baseline response; loss of best response was observed in 0 and 50% of I and R pts, respectively, and in 23% and 40% of pona-naïve and -exposed pts, respectively. At baseline, mutational status was assessed by Sanger sequencing in 8/12 R pts and 3/8 (38%) harbored ABL mutations (n=2 T315I, n=1 G250E); none of these 3 pts achieved MMR (2 died, 1 was still on asc without alternative therapy). Of 5/8 pts without baseline mutations: 1 achieved stable MMR, 2 stable MR2 and 2 stopped asc due to resistance with new mutations detected (n=1 T315I/R483Q compound mutation, n=1 G254W and RUNX1 mutations - the latter identified only by next-generation sequencing). In our real-world mono-center experience, asc improved molecular response in most cases with excellent tolerance also in very elderly and comorbid pts. The benefit was seen especially in pts without history of resistance or pre-treated with pona and in absence of mutations including T315I. More data are needed to elucidate the role of emerging asc-resistant mutations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DP124 | CHARACTERISTICS, OUTCOMES AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS RECEIVING ASCIMINIB IN BOLOGNA

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
article

DP124 | CHARACTERISTICS, OUTCOMES AND MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA PATIENTS RECEIVING ASCIMINIB IN BOLOGNA

article en

Abstract

Asciminib (asc), an allosteric inhibitor, is an effective and safe option for patients (pts) in late and early chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In Italy, outside of clinical trials, in April 2019 asc became available through a Managed Access Program approved by Novartis for pts resistant or intolerant (R/I) to ≥2 tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) without T315I mutation; since August 2024 it has been approved for commercial use by AIFA. We report our single-center experience of asc use as per clinical practice. We retrospectively collected data of 21 CML pts treated with asc in our Institute between November 2020 and November 2024. Most pts were elderly with a median age of 71 (range 37-90) years and with multiple comorbidities (57% had CCI >4), including cardiovascular ones (86%). The median number of prior TKIs were 3 (2-4); only 5 pts (24%) were ponatinib (pona)-exposed. Switch to asc occurred for sole intolerance in 9 pts (43%) and for resistance in 12 (57%) At baseline, 55% of pts had BCR::ABL1<sup>IS</sup> >1%; 20% of pts had major molecular response (MMR) or better. After 25 months of median follow-up and duration of therapy, most pts (81%) remained on asc. Reason for discontinuation was resistance (n=2) and death (n=2; 1 progressed to myeloid blast crisis, MBC). The cumulative incidence (CI) of MR2 at 12, 24 and 48 weeks was 18%, 64% and 82%, respectively; the CI of MMR was 13%, 44% and 50%, respectively. Overall, 80% of pts improved baseline response; loss of best response was observed in 0 and 50% of I and R pts, respectively, and in 23% and 40% of pona-naïve and -exposed pts, respectively. At baseline, mutational status was assessed by Sanger sequencing in 8/12 R pts and 3/8 (38%) harbored ABL mutations (n=2 T315I, n=1 G250E); none of these 3 pts achieved MMR (2 died, 1 was still on asc without alternative therapy). Of 5/8 pts without baseline mutations: 1 achieved stable MMR, 2 stable MR2 and 2 stopped asc due to resistance with new mutations detected (n=1 T315I/R483Q compound mutation, n=1 G254W and RUNX1 mutations - the latter identified only by next-generation sequencing). In our real-world mono-center experience, asc improved molecular response in most cases with excellent tolerance also in very elderly and comorbid pts. The benefit was seen especially in pts without history of resistance or pre-treated with pona and in absence of mutations including T315I. More data are needed to elucidate the role of emerging asc-resistant mutations.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IT), Istituto di Ematologia di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.