Bridging vision and action: Integrating urban Living Labs and future methodologies

Urban Living Labs (ULLs) and futures methodologies (e.g., scenario planning, back casting) are increasingly used to address complex urban challenges. While ULLs enable participatory, place-based experimentation, futures methods offer strategic direction by imagining long-term societal transitions. This conceptual paper explores how integrating both approaches can create synergies that enhance their individual and collective impact. We argue that futures methods can situate ULL experiments within broader narratives, while ULLs ground abstract futures methods and outcomes in tangible, local contexts. We identify three levels where integration adds value: (1) individual, by fostering futures literacy and empowering participants; (2) organizational, by aligning ULLs with long-term strategies and strengthening cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) ecosystemic, by embedding ULLs in city-wide transition pathways and improving policy coherence. The combined approach helps shift cities from fragmented innovation to deliberate transformation. However, challenges such as temporal misalignment, institutional silos, and evaluation gaps remain. This paper offers an initial conceptual mapping of these synergies and calls for empirical validation. We suggest that purposeful integration of foresight and ULLs can enhance both the relevance and scalability of urban innovation, bridging the gap between vision and implementation in sustainable city-making.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17406526
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging vision and action: Integrating urban Living Labs and future methodologies

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Bridging vision and action: Integrating urban Living Labs and future methodologies

article en

Abstract

Urban Living Labs (ULLs) and futures methodologies (e.g., scenario planning, back casting) are increasingly used to address complex urban challenges. While ULLs enable participatory, place-based experimentation, futures methods offer strategic direction by imagining long-term societal transitions. This conceptual paper explores how integrating both approaches can create synergies that enhance their individual and collective impact. We argue that futures methods can situate ULL experiments within broader narratives, while ULLs ground abstract futures methods and outcomes in tangible, local contexts. We identify three levels where integration adds value: (1) individual, by fostering futures literacy and empowering participants; (2) organizational, by aligning ULLs with long-term strategies and strengthening cross-sectoral collaboration; and (3) ecosystemic, by embedding ULLs in city-wide transition pathways and improving policy coherence. The combined approach helps shift cities from fragmented innovation to deliberate transformation. However, challenges such as temporal misalignment, institutional silos, and evaluation gaps remain. This paper offers an initial conceptual mapping of these synergies and calls for empirical validation. We suggest that purposeful integration of foresight and ULLs can enhance both the relevance and scalability of urban innovation, bridging the gap between vision and implementation in sustainable city-making.

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Ghent University Hospital (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.