Optimizing Sequence-to-Graph Alignment

Graph‑based reference genomes preserve population‑level variation that linear references cannot, yet the combinatorial expansion of candidate paths grows exponentially (2k for k variant nodes) with each additional variant node making sequence‑to‑graph alignment computationally demanding. We evaluate four alignment strategies, a greedy heuristic, dynamic programming (DP), exhaustive search, and exhaustive search with early stopping, on synthetic directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) containing 10-20 nodes with a 10% branching probability and simulated short reads. The greedy heuristic completes in <1 ms per read but attains only 43 % alignment accuracy. Early‑stop exhaustive search guarantees 100 % accuracy but requires 2.3s per read, underscoring the cost of exhaustive exploration and the tradeoff between runtime and completeness. DP achieves a balanced profile, delivering 93% accuracy with a runtime two orders of magnitude faster than exhaustive search. These results map the speed‑accuracy frontier in sequence‑to‑graph alignment and motivate banded DP and heuristic pruning to scale analyses to kilobase‑scale genome graphs.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5222
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Sequence-to-Graph Alignment

George Mason University
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
article

Optimizing Sequence-to-Graph Alignment

article en

Abstract

Graph‑based reference genomes preserve population‑level variation that linear references cannot, yet the combinatorial expansion of candidate paths grows exponentially (2k for k variant nodes) with each additional variant node making sequence‑to‑graph alignment computationally demanding. We evaluate four alignment strategies, a greedy heuristic, dynamic programming (DP), exhaustive search, and exhaustive search with early stopping, on synthetic directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) containing 10-20 nodes with a 10% branching probability and simulated short reads. The greedy heuristic completes in <1 ms per read but attains only 43 % alignment accuracy. Early‑stop exhaustive search guarantees 100 % accuracy but requires 2.3s per read, underscoring the cost of exhaustive exploration and the tradeoff between runtime and completeness. DP achieves a balanced profile, delivering 93% accuracy with a runtime two orders of magnitude faster than exhaustive search. These results map the speed‑accuracy frontier in sequence‑to‑graph alignment and motivate banded DP and heuristic pruning to scale analyses to kilobase‑scale genome graphs.

George Mason University
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.