Determining the Optimal LLM for a Hybrid-Model, Conversational Feedback Tool in Educational Dialogue Systems

With the growing demand for accessible, personalized education, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) have sought to address individual learners’ needs through adaptive feedback. However, evaluating and generating effective, conversational feedback for free response questions remains a major challenge. Current specialized, individual models have achieved great successes in their respective aims (e.g. response grading, student confidence analysis, conversational responses), yet new ITSs struggle to capitalize on these gains, instead relying on outdated all-in-one systems. This research aims to study a hybrid-model approach, wherein multiple modern, specialized models are leveraged to analyze an open-ended answer, adapt to the student, and deliver conversational feedback effectively. GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, DeepSeek R1, TinyLlama, and Claude Sonnet 4 received 10 manually-curated prompts with different school subjects (STEM, Humanities, and the Arts), problems, and student responses, corresponding to the future hybrid-model design. Each LLM’s response is graded independently by two researchers based on a rubric with five categories (Conversationality, Relevance, Factual Accuracy, Ease of Understanding, and Helpfulness) of five points each. Claude Sonnet 4 produced the best results with an average response score of 23.325 (SD=1.700, t-test: pvalueGPT=0.0135, pvalueGemini= 0.0005 ). GPT-4o (scored 22.275) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (scored 21.575) were second with similar performance, while DeepSeek R1 (scored 19.400) and TinyLlama (scored 11.700) ran into significantly lower scores. Claude produces extremely digestible, insightful feedback and hints while still allowing the student to learn firsthand and develop the final answer, making it the most effective LLM to use. Going forward, Claude will be the center of the hybrid-model ITS, with non-LLM models contributing information such as response grades and student confidence.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5158
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Determining the Optimal LLM for a Hybrid-Model, Conversational Feedback Tool in Educational Dialogue Systems

George Mason University
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

Determining the Optimal LLM for a Hybrid-Model, Conversational Feedback Tool in Educational Dialogue Systems

article en

Abstract

With the growing demand for accessible, personalized education, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) have sought to address individual learners’ needs through adaptive feedback. However, evaluating and generating effective, conversational feedback for free response questions remains a major challenge. Current specialized, individual models have achieved great successes in their respective aims (e.g. response grading, student confidence analysis, conversational responses), yet new ITSs struggle to capitalize on these gains, instead relying on outdated all-in-one systems. This research aims to study a hybrid-model approach, wherein multiple modern, specialized models are leveraged to analyze an open-ended answer, adapt to the student, and deliver conversational feedback effectively. GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0 Flash, DeepSeek R1, TinyLlama, and Claude Sonnet 4 received 10 manually-curated prompts with different school subjects (STEM, Humanities, and the Arts), problems, and student responses, corresponding to the future hybrid-model design. Each LLM’s response is graded independently by two researchers based on a rubric with five categories (Conversationality, Relevance, Factual Accuracy, Ease of Understanding, and Helpfulness) of five points each. Claude Sonnet 4 produced the best results with an average response score of 23.325 (SD=1.700, t-test: pvalueGPT=0.0135, pvalueGemini= 0.0005 ). GPT-4o (scored 22.275) and Gemini 2.0 Flash (scored 21.575) were second with similar performance, while DeepSeek R1 (scored 19.400) and TinyLlama (scored 11.700) ran into significantly lower scores. Claude produces extremely digestible, insightful feedback and hints while still allowing the student to learn firsthand and develop the final answer, making it the most effective LLM to use. Going forward, Claude will be the center of the hybrid-model ITS, with non-LLM models contributing information such as response grades and student confidence.

George Mason University
George Mason University (US), Laurel University (US), Green Valley High School (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.