IMAGERY, SYMBOLISM, AND VISION IN THE WORKS OF T.S. ELIOT AND EZRA POUND

This paper explores the intricate roles of imagery, symbolism, and vision in the works of T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound, two central figures of Anglo-American Modernism. Both poets redefined twentieth-century poetics by reshaping traditional forms into experimental modes of expression that foregrounded fragmentation, intertextuality, and imagist precision. Through a comparative textual analysis of Eliot’s The Waste Land (1922) and Pound’s Cantos (1915–1962), this study investigates how visual and symbolic structures embody the modernist search for order in the face of cultural disintegration. Eliot’s imagery often reflects spiritual desolation, historical cycles, and mythic archetypes, while Pound’s symbolism draws from classical, Asian, and economic references, conveying a global and historical vision. The findings reveal that both poets employed imagery and symbolism not only as aesthetic devices but also as intellectual strategies to reconstruct meaning within a fragmented modern world. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that Eliot and Pound share a visionary impulse to transcend mere description: they transform imagery into symbolic structures that articulate cultural critique, spiritual inquiry, and aesthetic renewal.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17390687
Primary Topic
Modernist Literature and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMAGERY, SYMBOLISM, AND VISION IN THE WORKS OF T.S. ELIOT AND EZRA POUND

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Modernist Literature and Criticism
article

IMAGERY, SYMBOLISM, AND VISION IN THE WORKS OF T.S. ELIOT AND EZRA POUND

article en

Abstract

This paper explores the intricate roles of imagery, symbolism, and vision in the works of T.S. Eliot and Ezra Pound, two central figures of Anglo-American Modernism. Both poets redefined twentieth-century poetics by reshaping traditional forms into experimental modes of expression that foregrounded fragmentation, intertextuality, and imagist precision. Through a comparative textual analysis of Eliot’s The Waste Land (1922) and Pound’s Cantos (1915–1962), this study investigates how visual and symbolic structures embody the modernist search for order in the face of cultural disintegration. Eliot’s imagery often reflects spiritual desolation, historical cycles, and mythic archetypes, while Pound’s symbolism draws from classical, Asian, and economic references, conveying a global and historical vision. The findings reveal that both poets employed imagery and symbolism not only as aesthetic devices but also as intellectual strategies to reconstruct meaning within a fragmented modern world. Ultimately, this research demonstrates that Eliot and Pound share a visionary impulse to transcend mere description: they transform imagery into symbolic structures that articulate cultural critique, spiritual inquiry, and aesthetic renewal.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nordic International University, International University (KH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Modernist Literature and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

IMAGERY, SYMBOLISM, AND VISION IN THE WORKS OF T.S. ELIOT AND EZRA POUND · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS