A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Integration within Argumentation and Graph-based Open Student Modeling Software (ARGOS)

This project aims to develop Argumentation and Graph-based Open Student Modeling Software (ARGOS), an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) that displays a dynamic Open Student Model (OSM) based on real-time conversation. Researchers have explored various conversational agents, assessment-based knowledge displays, and Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) to model students’ understanding. However, it lacks a system that uses live dialogue to track and update a student’s cognitive progress and understanding in real-time. To determine which Large Language Model (LLM) best suits ARGOS, this study evaluates the abilities of ChatGPT 4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 3, Meta AI, and Claude Sonnet 4 to guide student understanding. First, the LLMs were given a system prompt with detailed instructions on how to act as Socratic tutors by asking guiding questions and staying on task. Each model was prompted, one dialogue at a time, with four standardized scenarios involving an imaginary student attempting to factor 12x² + 17x + 6. The scenarios were designed to simulate: (1) providing a correct solution, (2) making a standard conceptual error, (3) making a simple calculation mistake, and (4) going off-topic. Then, four researchers scored the conversations produced by the LLMs using a detailed 30-point rubric that evaluated each model on educational quality, factual accuracy, and instructional following ability. Gemini 2.5 Pro scored the highest, with an average score and standard deviation of 26.625 and 2.55, respectively. Additionally, the one-way ANOVA test resulted in a p-value of 3.05*10-7, proving the data was statistically significant. Thus, the experiment proved Gemini 2.5 Pro as the most effective LLM, ensuring ARGOS will be built on a capable and reliable tutor for real-time conversation. Further research will focus on testing Gemini 2.5 Pro’s ability to accurately quantify students' mastery scores.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5164
Primary Topic
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Integration within Argumentation and Graph-based Open Student Modeling Software (ARGOS)

George Mason University
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
article

A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Integration within Argumentation and Graph-based Open Student Modeling Software (ARGOS)

article en

Abstract

This project aims to develop Argumentation and Graph-based Open Student Modeling Software (ARGOS), an Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) that displays a dynamic Open Student Model (OSM) based on real-time conversation. Researchers have explored various conversational agents, assessment-based knowledge displays, and Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT) to model students’ understanding. However, it lacks a system that uses live dialogue to track and update a student’s cognitive progress and understanding in real-time. To determine which Large Language Model (LLM) best suits ARGOS, this study evaluates the abilities of ChatGPT 4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok 3, Meta AI, and Claude Sonnet 4 to guide student understanding. First, the LLMs were given a system prompt with detailed instructions on how to act as Socratic tutors by asking guiding questions and staying on task. Each model was prompted, one dialogue at a time, with four standardized scenarios involving an imaginary student attempting to factor 12x² + 17x + 6. The scenarios were designed to simulate: (1) providing a correct solution, (2) making a standard conceptual error, (3) making a simple calculation mistake, and (4) going off-topic. Then, four researchers scored the conversations produced by the LLMs using a detailed 30-point rubric that evaluated each model on educational quality, factual accuracy, and instructional following ability. Gemini 2.5 Pro scored the highest, with an average score and standard deviation of 26.625 and 2.55, respectively. Additionally, the one-way ANOVA test resulted in a p-value of 3.05*10-7, proving the data was statistically significant. Thus, the experiment proved Gemini 2.5 Pro as the most effective LLM, ensuring ARGOS will be built on a capable and reliable tutor for real-time conversation. Further research will focus on testing Gemini 2.5 Pro’s ability to accurately quantify students' mastery scores.

George Mason University
George Mason University (US), Brunswick (United States) (US), Monroe County Library System (US), Kennedy Memorial Hospital (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.