Generative AI Use Among Saudi and Korean Language Learners in Higher Education: Examination Through a Modified TAM Framework

This study explores the integration of generative AI (GAI) tools in second language acquisition (SLA) through an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Focusing on Saudi and Korean English language learners (ELLs), it examines the relationships among perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived benefits, and actual use (i.e., task-based behavior) of GAI in English foreign language (EFL) learning. While perceived usefulness captures the functional utility of GAI tools for specific language learning tasks, perceived benefits encompass broader educational outcomes, including enhanced language proficiency, greater academic support, and increased learner confidence. Data were collected from 681 participants (407 Saudi, 274 Korean) and analyzed using mean scores, correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The model demonstrated a satisfactory fit, explaining 79% of the variance in actual use, with the model accounting for 70% of the variance in perceived benefits. Comparing models with and without perceived benefits revealed a 6% increase in explained variance ( ΔR 2 = .06). Cross-cultural differences emerged in learner perceptions and adoption intentions, providing a deeper understanding of how students engage with GAI tools in language learning contexts. These findings offer practical insights for the effective integration of AI in SLA settings.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251387804
Citations
2
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI Use Among Saudi and Korean Language Learners in Higher Education: Examination Through a Modified TAM Framework

2 citations
SAGE Open
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
article

Generative AI Use Among Saudi and Korean Language Learners in Higher Education: Examination Through a Modified TAM Framework

article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study explores the integration of generative AI (GAI) tools in second language acquisition (SLA) through an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Focusing on Saudi and Korean English language learners (ELLs), it examines the relationships among perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived benefits, and actual use (i.e., task-based behavior) of GAI in English foreign language (EFL) learning. While perceived usefulness captures the functional utility of GAI tools for specific language learning tasks, perceived benefits encompass broader educational outcomes, including enhanced language proficiency, greater academic support, and increased learner confidence. Data were collected from 681 participants (407 Saudi, 274 Korean) and analyzed using mean scores, correlation analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The model demonstrated a satisfactory fit, explaining 79% of the variance in actual use, with the model accounting for 70% of the variance in perceived benefits. Comparing models with and without perceived benefits revealed a 6% increase in explained variance ( ΔR 2 = .06). Cross-cultural differences emerged in learner perceptions and adoption intentions, providing a deeper understanding of how students engage with GAI tools in language learning contexts. These findings offer practical insights for the effective integration of AI in SLA settings.

SAGE OpenVol. 15(4)
Austin Peay State University (US), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
AI in Service Interactions
4.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.