Allocation and prioritization of hospital pharmacist clinical services in British Columbia

Background: Clinical pharmacists are a limited resource in British Columbia (BC). Few studies have been conducted to explore hospital clinical pharmacist allocation. It is unclear how pharmacy leaders prioritize the allocation of their pharmacist staff to provide clinical services at their sites. Objectives: To characterize how hospital pharmacy leaders allocate their pharmacists within their sites. Methods: This qualitative study used key informant interviews of hospital pharmacy leaders in BC, Canada. Seven questions were included in the interview guide, asking participants about their philosophy for organizing clinical pharmacist coverage, exploring the adequacy of current staff levels, asking about barriers and enablers, and looking at the use of quality assurance mechanisms. Results: Sixteen participants were interviewed. The data yielded five themes: clinical staff allocation, barriers to providing optimal pharmacy services, clinical work prioritization, staff training and recruitment, and quality assurance. Conclusions: Pharmacy leaders in BC consider a variety of factors in allocating their clinical staff. While funding is an important factor in human resource allocation, even with adequate funding, there is a lack of adequately trained staff to fill available positions. Future exploration is needed to determine the best method of pharmacist allocation in relation to patient outcomes and to identify novel ways to support training of clinical pharmacists.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allocation and prioritization of hospital pharmacist clinical services in British Columbia

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Allocation and prioritization of hospital pharmacist clinical services in British Columbia

article en

Abstract

Background: Clinical pharmacists are a limited resource in British Columbia (BC). Few studies have been conducted to explore hospital clinical pharmacist allocation. It is unclear how pharmacy leaders prioritize the allocation of their pharmacist staff to provide clinical services at their sites. Objectives: To characterize how hospital pharmacy leaders allocate their pharmacists within their sites. Methods: This qualitative study used key informant interviews of hospital pharmacy leaders in BC, Canada. Seven questions were included in the interview guide, asking participants about their philosophy for organizing clinical pharmacist coverage, exploring the adequacy of current staff levels, asking about barriers and enablers, and looking at the use of quality assurance mechanisms. Results: Sixteen participants were interviewed. The data yielded five themes: clinical staff allocation, barriers to providing optimal pharmacy services, clinical work prioritization, staff training and recruitment, and quality assurance. Conclusions: Pharmacy leaders in BC consider a variety of factors in allocating their clinical staff. While funding is an important factor in human resource allocation, even with adequate funding, there is a lack of adequately trained staff to fill available positions. Future exploration is needed to determine the best method of pharmacist allocation in relation to patient outcomes and to identify novel ways to support training of clinical pharmacists.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Interior Health (CA), Island Health (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), West Pharmaceutical Services (United Kingdom) (GB), Vancouver General Hospital (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.