Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina

Molecular docking is a crucial computational tool in drug discovery enabling the prediction of ligand-target interactions and accelerating the screening of potential drug candidates. This study compares twowidely used docking algorithms AutodockVina and Attracting Cavities to evaluate their efficiency, accuracy and applicability in molecular docking studies. AutodockVina is known for its speed and computational efficiency making it suitable for high-throughput screening. In contrast, Attracting Cavities provides more accurate binding predictions particularly for covalent interactions but it requires significantly more computational time. The studies suggest that AutodockVina is preferable for rapid screening whereas Attracting Cavities is advantageous for detailed validation studies. Despite these advancements, molecular docking faces challenges in flexibility modelling, scoring function accuracy and solvation effects. Future directions involve integrating machine learning and quantum chemistry to improve predictive accuracy. This study highlights the importance of selecting docking algorithms based on study-specific requirements for drug discovery.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17383399
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina

article en

Abstract

Molecular docking is a crucial computational tool in drug discovery enabling the prediction of ligand-target interactions and accelerating the screening of potential drug candidates. This study compares twowidely used docking algorithms AutodockVina and Attracting Cavities to evaluate their efficiency, accuracy and applicability in molecular docking studies. AutodockVina is known for its speed and computational efficiency making it suitable for high-throughput screening. In contrast, Attracting Cavities provides more accurate binding predictions particularly for covalent interactions but it requires significantly more computational time. The studies suggest that AutodockVina is preferable for rapid screening whereas Attracting Cavities is advantageous for detailed validation studies. Despite these advancements, molecular docking faces challenges in flexibility modelling, scoring function accuracy and solvation effects. Future directions involve integrating machine learning and quantum chemistry to improve predictive accuracy. This study highlights the importance of selecting docking algorithms based on study-specific requirements for drug discovery.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Swiss Dock 2025: Docking approaches comparison between attracting cavities and autodockvina · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS