The Conflict of Integrational Jamaah AL Zainab Mosque Integrational Conflict of Jamaah Al Zaenab Mosque According to The Conflict Theory and Fiqih Ikftilaf Perspectives

The conflict at the Al Zainab Mosque arose from two main issues. First, there was a misunderstanding between Moel and Latif regarding Moel's desire to provide commentary and interpretation within the mosque. Second, there were differences of opinion concerning the placement of the Saff. Moel and his supporters wanted to change the position of the Saff to align with the mosque building, while Latif and his supporters preferred to maintain the Saff's position facing the right corner of the mosque, as this direction corresponds with the Qibla. The conflict that occurred at the Al Zainab Mosque, according to Dahrendorf, is natural because conflict and differences can ultimately lead to peace and equality. This is demonstrated by the events at the current Al Zainab Mosque. After a prolonged conflict from 1998 to 2019, through coordination and mutual understanding among the conflicting parties, the dispute finally ended and transformed into a harmonious peace. Furthermore, from 2020 to 2024, the unity of the congregation became evident.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17385160
Primary Topic
Architecture and Cultural Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Conflict of Integrational Jamaah AL Zainab Mosque Integrational Conflict of Jamaah Al Zaenab Mosque According to The Conflict Theory and Fiqih Ikftilaf Perspectives

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Architecture and Cultural Influences
article

The Conflict of Integrational Jamaah AL Zainab Mosque Integrational Conflict of Jamaah Al Zaenab Mosque According to The Conflict Theory and Fiqih Ikftilaf Perspectives

article en

Abstract

The conflict at the Al Zainab Mosque arose from two main issues. First, there was a misunderstanding between Moel and Latif regarding Moel's desire to provide commentary and interpretation within the mosque. Second, there were differences of opinion concerning the placement of the Saff. Moel and his supporters wanted to change the position of the Saff to align with the mosque building, while Latif and his supporters preferred to maintain the Saff's position facing the right corner of the mosque, as this direction corresponds with the Qibla. The conflict that occurred at the Al Zainab Mosque, according to Dahrendorf, is natural because conflict and differences can ultimately lead to peace and equality. This is demonstrated by the events at the current Al Zainab Mosque. After a prolonged conflict from 1998 to 2019, through coordination and mutual understanding among the conflicting parties, the dispute finally ended and transformed into a harmonious peace. Furthermore, from 2020 to 2024, the unity of the congregation became evident.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Architecture and Cultural Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.