Development and validation of an analytical pyrolysis method for determination of microplastic polymers in atmospheric aerosols

There is a need to develop analytical techniques for detection of airborne microplastic particles due to increasing evidence of their presence in ambient air and the associated possible health and climate effects. Current analytical methods are limited by particle size and subjective visual evaluation. We have tested and validated an analytical pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, py-GC-MS, method that was developed specifically for detection of micro- and nanoplastic particles in aerosol samples. Some of the most common polymers, namely polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyurethane (PU), polyamide (PA) and polystyrene (PS), were mixed and analyzed in atmospherically relevant sample matrices. A temperature-ramped selected ion monitoring (SIM) method was developed to detect them, based on characteristic pyrolysis products identified in pyrograms of each polymer individually and in their mixtures. Calibration curves in the range 10 ng – 1 µg were determined for each polymer with R 2 values ranging from 0.72 to 0.99. A negative matrix effect was observed for reactive pyrolysis products, which was stronger in samples containing more aerosol matrix. This effect may be caused by secondary reactions between the pyrolysis products and aerosol matrix components. On the contrary a positive matrix effect was observed for PVC, possibly due to the addition of alkenes by the matrix which partake in radical reactions to form naphthalene. Deuterated polystyrene was tested as an internal standard to account for the matrix effect, but it was found to only be suitable for PS and PP. Other internal standards are thus needed for the other polymers. This study presents a method for direct analysis of aerosol particle samples with quantification of PP, PS, and PA on the nanogram scale and semi-quantification of PE, PU, PET, and PVC, also in the sub-microgram range. • Novel analysis method for atmospheric PE, PP, PVC, PET, PU, PA, and PS using direct py-GC-MS • Quantitative for PP, PA, and PS and semi-quantitative for PE, PU, PET, and PVC on the nanogram scale • Method validated for the polymers in aerosol matrix from candle emissions and urban PM 2.5 .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Published
2025-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2025.107423
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an analytical pyrolysis method for determination of microplastic polymers in atmospheric aerosols

Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Development and validation of an analytical pyrolysis method for determination of microplastic polymers in atmospheric aerosols

article en

Abstract

There is a need to develop analytical techniques for detection of airborne microplastic particles due to increasing evidence of their presence in ambient air and the associated possible health and climate effects. Current analytical methods are limited by particle size and subjective visual evaluation. We have tested and validated an analytical pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, py-GC-MS, method that was developed specifically for detection of micro- and nanoplastic particles in aerosol samples. Some of the most common polymers, namely polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyurethane (PU), polyamide (PA) and polystyrene (PS), were mixed and analyzed in atmospherically relevant sample matrices. A temperature-ramped selected ion monitoring (SIM) method was developed to detect them, based on characteristic pyrolysis products identified in pyrograms of each polymer individually and in their mixtures. Calibration curves in the range 10 ng – 1 µg were determined for each polymer with R 2 values ranging from 0.72 to 0.99. A negative matrix effect was observed for reactive pyrolysis products, which was stronger in samples containing more aerosol matrix. This effect may be caused by secondary reactions between the pyrolysis products and aerosol matrix components. On the contrary a positive matrix effect was observed for PVC, possibly due to the addition of alkenes by the matrix which partake in radical reactions to form naphthalene. Deuterated polystyrene was tested as an internal standard to account for the matrix effect, but it was found to only be suitable for PS and PP. Other internal standards are thus needed for the other polymers. This study presents a method for direct analysis of aerosol particle samples with quantification of PP, PS, and PA on the nanogram scale and semi-quantification of PE, PU, PET, and PVC, also in the sub-microgram range. • Novel analysis method for atmospheric PE, PP, PVC, PET, PU, PA, and PS using direct py-GC-MS • Quantitative for PP, PA, and PS and semi-quantitative for PE, PU, PET, and PVC on the nanogram scale • Method validated for the polymers in aerosol matrix from candle emissions and urban PM 2.5 .

Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisVol. 193
Aarhus University (DK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and validation of an analytical pyrolysis method for determination of microplastic polymers in atmospheric aerosols · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS