Identifying assessment frameworks for digital public health interventions: First results of a scoping review

The global pandemic accelerated the rise of digital public health (DPH), yet standardized assessment procedures for digital public health interventions (DPHIs) remain limited. This scoping review aims to identify existing assessment frameworks applicable to DPHIs. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, the Healthcare Administration Database, and Google Scholar, following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. English-language full-text studies published since 2020 were included. Of 1,196 studies screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. One DPHI framework was identified, alongside three generic digital health frameworks and an adapted RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) model. Findings reveal a significant gap in validated assessment frameworks for DPHIs. Broader frameworks that consider social, cultural, and country-specific factors are needed to fully realize the potential of DPHIs and address issues like the digital divide.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3205/mibe000289
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying assessment frameworks for digital public health interventions: First results of a scoping review

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Identifying assessment frameworks for digital public health interventions: First results of a scoping review

article en

Abstract

The global pandemic accelerated the rise of digital public health (DPH), yet standardized assessment procedures for digital public health interventions (DPHIs) remain limited. This scoping review aims to identify existing assessment frameworks applicable to DPHIs. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, the Healthcare Administration Database, and Google Scholar, following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. English-language full-text studies published since 2020 were included. Of 1,196 studies screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. One DPHI framework was identified, alongside three generic digital health frameworks and an adapted RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) model. Findings reveal a significant gap in validated assessment frameworks for DPHIs. Broader frameworks that consider social, cultural, and country-specific factors are needed to fully realize the potential of DPHIs and address issues like the digital divide.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Neu-Ulm University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.