Optimization of RPPA Protocols for FFPE Tissue: A Comparison of Protein Extraction, Protein Printing, and Total Protein Staining Methods

Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) is a technique that microprints proteins from a given sample onto a nitrocellulose coated slide, and utilizes specific antibodies to measure protein expression. These arrays can be constructed using proteins extracted from a variety of sample materials such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. However, there has been debate over the reproducibility of methods used to extract proteins and break formaldehyde cross-links of FFPE tissue for downstream analysis. Currently, the CAPMM lab constructs RPPAs using solid-pin printing, but are in the process of introducing a new inkjet style printing process in addition to a new laser scanning system. The new printing process deposits a smaller amount of total protein per spot on the microarrays, which can make high backgrounds problematic for data analysis. Additionally, the new laser scanning system is not compatible with the current total protein stain, and the high sample background that is frequently observed with FFPE extracted protein can be obstructive for total protein normalization and downstream analysis. These issues require modified protocols for protein extraction, sample printing, and total protein staining. In this experiment, RRPA arrays were constructed using protein from FFPE tissue collected via Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) to compare the new printing process, extraction buffer, and new total protein stain with current protocols. The results of this experiment showed that the inkjet printing process produces smaller spots, thus reduces total protein printed. Overall, a decreased background was observed in Fast Green vs. SYPRO Ruby Red total protein staining. Finally, reduced background from TCEP vs. Qproteome® buffer extracted protein showed mixed results. These findings will help improve in-house modification of current protocols.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5290
Primary Topic
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of RPPA Protocols for FFPE Tissue: A Comparison of Protein Extraction, Protein Printing, and Total Protein Staining Methods

George Mason University
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
article

Optimization of RPPA Protocols for FFPE Tissue: A Comparison of Protein Extraction, Protein Printing, and Total Protein Staining Methods

article en

Abstract

Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) is a technique that microprints proteins from a given sample onto a nitrocellulose coated slide, and utilizes specific antibodies to measure protein expression. These arrays can be constructed using proteins extracted from a variety of sample materials such as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. However, there has been debate over the reproducibility of methods used to extract proteins and break formaldehyde cross-links of FFPE tissue for downstream analysis. Currently, the CAPMM lab constructs RPPAs using solid-pin printing, but are in the process of introducing a new inkjet style printing process in addition to a new laser scanning system. The new printing process deposits a smaller amount of total protein per spot on the microarrays, which can make high backgrounds problematic for data analysis. Additionally, the new laser scanning system is not compatible with the current total protein stain, and the high sample background that is frequently observed with FFPE extracted protein can be obstructive for total protein normalization and downstream analysis. These issues require modified protocols for protein extraction, sample printing, and total protein staining. In this experiment, RRPA arrays were constructed using protein from FFPE tissue collected via Laser Capture Microdissection (LCM) to compare the new printing process, extraction buffer, and new total protein stain with current protocols. The results of this experiment showed that the inkjet printing process produces smaller spots, thus reduces total protein printed. Overall, a decreased background was observed in Fast Green vs. SYPRO Ruby Red total protein staining. Finally, reduced background from TCEP vs. Qproteome® buffer extracted protein showed mixed results. These findings will help improve in-house modification of current protocols.

George Mason University
James Madison University (US), George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.