Evaluating AI Models in SWE Prediction

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) is an essential metric for analyzing water supply and climate in specific areas. Over the years, various AI models have been used to predict SWE. These AI models allow us to monitor SWE from a distance; however, the accuracy of each type of model is still up for debate. In this study, we built and tested 4 different types of AI models to measure their accuracy in SWE prediction: a Graph Neural Network (GNN), a Transformer, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and a Random Forest (RF) model. Currently, GNN, which uses graph nodes to generate predictions, and Transformer, which uses self-attention to determine the importance of variables, are considered to be among the most cutting-edge models for SWE prediction. LSTM, which uses memory to learn prediction patterns, and RF, which uses decision trees, are considered to be older models. The models were trained on historical data sets from 2018 to 2021, which included variables such as precipitation, air temperature, and humidity. Model accuracy was measured based on Mean Squared Error (MSE) and the R2 metric. Our current findings show that the GNN model had the lowest MSE and the highest R2 overall, showing the highest accuracy. This suggests that models that can represent data as graphs can be more effective for SWE prediction.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5328
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating AI Models in SWE Prediction

George Mason University
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Evaluating AI Models in SWE Prediction

article en

Abstract

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) is an essential metric for analyzing water supply and climate in specific areas. Over the years, various AI models have been used to predict SWE. These AI models allow us to monitor SWE from a distance; however, the accuracy of each type of model is still up for debate. In this study, we built and tested 4 different types of AI models to measure their accuracy in SWE prediction: a Graph Neural Network (GNN), a Transformer, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, and a Random Forest (RF) model. Currently, GNN, which uses graph nodes to generate predictions, and Transformer, which uses self-attention to determine the importance of variables, are considered to be among the most cutting-edge models for SWE prediction. LSTM, which uses memory to learn prediction patterns, and RF, which uses decision trees, are considered to be older models. The models were trained on historical data sets from 2018 to 2021, which included variables such as precipitation, air temperature, and humidity. Model accuracy was measured based on Mean Squared Error (MSE) and the R2 metric. Our current findings show that the GNN model had the lowest MSE and the highest R2 overall, showing the highest accuracy. This suggests that models that can represent data as graphs can be more effective for SWE prediction.

George Mason University
George Mason University (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating AI Models in SWE Prediction · George Mason University (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS