Evaluating the Performance of Three Flood Impact Analysis Tools

Flood modeling is a critical part of disaster preparedness and mitigation planning, especially in coastal and riverine urban areas prone to storm surge and flash flooding. Accurately predicting flood impacts can help both civilians and government officials prepare and reduce risk in the event of a flooding event. However, there are many free flood analysis tools that vary in effectiveness and accuracy of analysis. One option to determine risk is to look at flood maps to identify areas within flood zones; but this approach does not account for the depth of potential flooding, damage to infrastructure, or other quantifiable metrics. Other solutions, such as HAZUS-MH and FEMA FAST offer a more detailed analysis by considering the cost of building replacement, and the foundation materials used for construction. Elevation, building data, and a simulated flood mirroring flooding impacts of Hurricane Isobel for the city of Baltimore, MD was consistent throughout analysis. Both HAZUS and FAST yielded overestimates, with FAST being more accurate by 83%. Although there is no clear best tool for mitigation planning, FEMA FAST should be the preferred choice for flood risk analysis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
George Mason University
Published
2025-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13021/jssr2025.5350
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Performance of Three Flood Impact Analysis Tools

George Mason University
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Evaluating the Performance of Three Flood Impact Analysis Tools

article en

Abstract

Flood modeling is a critical part of disaster preparedness and mitigation planning, especially in coastal and riverine urban areas prone to storm surge and flash flooding. Accurately predicting flood impacts can help both civilians and government officials prepare and reduce risk in the event of a flooding event. However, there are many free flood analysis tools that vary in effectiveness and accuracy of analysis. One option to determine risk is to look at flood maps to identify areas within flood zones; but this approach does not account for the depth of potential flooding, damage to infrastructure, or other quantifiable metrics. Other solutions, such as HAZUS-MH and FEMA FAST offer a more detailed analysis by considering the cost of building replacement, and the foundation materials used for construction. Elevation, building data, and a simulated flood mirroring flooding impacts of Hurricane Isobel for the city of Baltimore, MD was consistent throughout analysis. Both HAZUS and FAST yielded overestimates, with FAST being more accurate by 83%. Although there is no clear best tool for mitigation planning, FEMA FAST should be the preferred choice for flood risk analysis.

George Mason University
George Mason University (US), GeoInformation (United Kingdom) (GB)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.