Epidural Labour Analgesia and Programmed Labour Analgesia in Controlling Labour Pain – A Study of 60 Cases

Background: Labour pain is one of the most severe forms of pain experienced by women. Analgesia during labour is a crucial component of modern obstetric practice. Epidural labour analgesia is considered the gold standard, but newer methods such as programmed labour analgesia (PLA) are increasingly being explored for efficacy, maternal satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.Objective: To compare the efficacy, maternal satisfaction, and obstetric/neonatal outcomes of epidural labour analgesia versus programmed labour analgesia in controlling labour pain. Methods & Materials: This prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 parturients admitted for vaginal delivery. Thirty women received epidural analgesia (Group A), while thirty received programmed labour analgesia (Group B). Pain relief was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Maternal hemodynamic parameters, labour duration, mode of delivery, maternal side effects, neonatal outcomes (APGAR score), and overall maternal satisfaction were recorded and compared. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant reduction in VAS scores after initiation of analgesia. Group A (epidural) achieved superior pain relief with mean VAS scores consistently <3 during active labour, while Group B (PLA) showed moderate pain relief with mean VAS scores around 4–5. Duration of first stage of labour was slightly prolonged in the epidural group compared to PLA. Maternal hypotension occurred more frequently in the epidural group (20%) versus PLA (6.6%). No significant differences were observed in APGAR scores between groups. Maternal satisfaction was high in both groups, but significantly greater in the epidural group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both epidural labour analgesia and programmed labour analgesia are effective in controlling labour pain, but epidural analgesia provides superior pain relief and higher maternal satisfaction at the expense of slightly prolonged labour and increased maternal hypotension. Programmed labour analgesia may be considered as a safe alternative where epidural services are limited.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17378911
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidural Labour Analgesia and Programmed Labour Analgesia in Controlling Labour Pain – A Study of 60 Cases

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Epidural Labour Analgesia and Programmed Labour Analgesia in Controlling Labour Pain – A Study of 60 Cases

article en

Abstract

Background: Labour pain is one of the most severe forms of pain experienced by women. Analgesia during labour is a crucial component of modern obstetric practice. Epidural labour analgesia is considered the gold standard, but newer methods such as programmed labour analgesia (PLA) are increasingly being explored for efficacy, maternal satisfaction, and neonatal outcomes.Objective: To compare the efficacy, maternal satisfaction, and obstetric/neonatal outcomes of epidural labour analgesia versus programmed labour analgesia in controlling labour pain. Methods & Materials: This prospective comparative study was conducted on 60 parturients admitted for vaginal delivery. Thirty women received epidural analgesia (Group A), while thirty received programmed labour analgesia (Group B). Pain relief was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Maternal hemodynamic parameters, labour duration, mode of delivery, maternal side effects, neonatal outcomes (APGAR score), and overall maternal satisfaction were recorded and compared. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant reduction in VAS scores after initiation of analgesia. Group A (epidural) achieved superior pain relief with mean VAS scores consistently <3 during active labour, while Group B (PLA) showed moderate pain relief with mean VAS scores around 4–5. Duration of first stage of labour was slightly prolonged in the epidural group compared to PLA. Maternal hypotension occurred more frequently in the epidural group (20%) versus PLA (6.6%). No significant differences were observed in APGAR scores between groups. Maternal satisfaction was high in both groups, but significantly greater in the epidural group (p<0.05). Conclusion: Both epidural labour analgesia and programmed labour analgesia are effective in controlling labour pain, but epidural analgesia provides superior pain relief and higher maternal satisfaction at the expense of slightly prolonged labour and increased maternal hypotension. Programmed labour analgesia may be considered as a safe alternative where epidural services are limited.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College (BD), North East University (BD)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.