THE POLITICS OF SILENCE AND SPEECH: WOMEN'S RESISTANCE IN MARGARET ATWOOD AND HENRIK IBSEN

Abstract This article examines the divergent politics of silence and speech as tools of female resistance inHenrik Ibsen's ‘A Doll’s House’ and‘Hedda Gabler’ and Margaret Atwood's ‘The Handmaid'sTale’and ‘The Penelopaid’. While both texts foreground the relationship between language,power, and patriarchal oppression, they offer contrasting models of women's agency. Ibsen’splay, a foundational text in feminist literature, presents speech as a singular, revolutionary act ofself-realization. The protagonist, Nora, moves from a life of performative, imposed silence to adramatic verbal declaration of independence, culminating in her famous departure. This modelframes resistance as a climactic, public assertion of voice that definitively shatters the socialcontract.In contrast, Atwood’s dystopian novel portrays a totalitarian society where overt speech issystemically suppressed and criminalized. The protagonist, Offred, cannot replicate Nora's grandgesture. Instead, her resistance operates in the covert and fragmented spaces of silence and codedcommunication. The article argues that Offred’s most significant act of rebellion is her internalmonologue, a silent narration that preserves her identity and memories against a regime designedto erase them. Her participation in illicit communication networks and her final act ofstorytelling demonstrate a politics of resistance that is not loud or definitive, but rather subtle,precarious, and ongoing.By comparing these two seminal works, the article concludes that the political landscape ofwomen's resistance has shifted. Ibsen's work champions the liberating power of a woman findingher voice, while Atwood’s text illustrates how that voice must adapt to survive when confrontedwith a more insidious, pervasive form of control. This analysis offers a nuanced understanding ofhow silence and speech function not as simple binaries, but as complex, evolving strategies forresisting patriarchal authority across different literary and historical contexts.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17378474
Primary Topic
Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE POLITICS OF SILENCE AND SPEECH: WOMEN'S RESISTANCE IN MARGARET ATWOOD AND HENRIK IBSEN

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
article

THE POLITICS OF SILENCE AND SPEECH: WOMEN'S RESISTANCE IN MARGARET ATWOOD AND HENRIK IBSEN

article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the divergent politics of silence and speech as tools of female resistance inHenrik Ibsen's ‘A Doll’s House’ and‘Hedda Gabler’ and Margaret Atwood's ‘The Handmaid'sTale’and ‘The Penelopaid’. While both texts foreground the relationship between language,power, and patriarchal oppression, they offer contrasting models of women's agency. Ibsen’splay, a foundational text in feminist literature, presents speech as a singular, revolutionary act ofself-realization. The protagonist, Nora, moves from a life of performative, imposed silence to adramatic verbal declaration of independence, culminating in her famous departure. This modelframes resistance as a climactic, public assertion of voice that definitively shatters the socialcontract.In contrast, Atwood’s dystopian novel portrays a totalitarian society where overt speech issystemically suppressed and criminalized. The protagonist, Offred, cannot replicate Nora's grandgesture. Instead, her resistance operates in the covert and fragmented spaces of silence and codedcommunication. The article argues that Offred’s most significant act of rebellion is her internalmonologue, a silent narration that preserves her identity and memories against a regime designedto erase them. Her participation in illicit communication networks and her final act ofstorytelling demonstrate a politics of resistance that is not loud or definitive, but rather subtle,precarious, and ongoing.By comparing these two seminal works, the article concludes that the political landscape ofwomen's resistance has shifted. Ibsen's work champions the liberating power of a woman findingher voice, while Atwood’s text illustrates how that voice must adapt to survive when confrontedwith a more insidious, pervasive form of control. This analysis offers a nuanced understanding ofhow silence and speech function not as simple binaries, but as complex, evolving strategies forresisting patriarchal authority across different literary and historical contexts.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Vaidyaratnam P.S. Varier Ayurveda College (IN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.