Comparative Outcomes between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Nephron-Sparing Surgery – A Retrospective Analysis

Objective: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp techniques during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Methods & Materials: A retrospective study of 70 patients who underwent NSS for renal tumors between January 2020 and July 2025. Patients were divided into two groups: Off-Clamp NSS (Group A, n=34) and On-Clamp NSS (Group B, n=36). Data on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), complications, and renal functional outcomes (eGFR changes) were analyzed. Results: Group A showed significantly higher EBL (p=0.02) but better postoperative renal function preservation (mean eGFR drop: 5.6% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Group B had shorter operative times and less intraoperative bleeding. No significant difference was observed in complication rates or oncologic margin positivity. Conclusion: Off-clamp NSS offers superior renal functional preservation compared to on-clamp NSS at the expense of higher blood loss. Patient selection remains crucial, and off-clamp NSS may be particularly beneficial in younger patients with baseline impaired renal function.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17379087
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Outcomes between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Nephron-Sparing Surgery – A Retrospective Analysis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Comparative Outcomes between Off-Clamp and On-Clamp Nephron-Sparing Surgery – A Retrospective Analysis

article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare perioperative and functional outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp techniques during nephron-sparing surgery (NSS). Methods & Materials: A retrospective study of 70 patients who underwent NSS for renal tumors between January 2020 and July 2025. Patients were divided into two groups: Off-Clamp NSS (Group A, n=34) and On-Clamp NSS (Group B, n=36). Data on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), warm ischemia time (WIT), complications, and renal functional outcomes (eGFR changes) were analyzed. Results: Group A showed significantly higher EBL (p=0.02) but better postoperative renal function preservation (mean eGFR drop: 5.6% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Group B had shorter operative times and less intraoperative bleeding. No significant difference was observed in complication rates or oncologic margin positivity. Conclusion: Off-clamp NSS offers superior renal functional preservation compared to on-clamp NSS at the expense of higher blood loss. Patient selection remains crucial, and off-clamp NSS may be particularly beneficial in younger patients with baseline impaired renal function.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Child Health Research Foundation (BD), National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute (BD), Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.