Benchmarking LLMs for Real-World Applications: From Numerical Metrics to Contextual and Qualitative Evaluation

The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has traditionally relied on static benchmarks that prioritize performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, BLEU and standardized tests. However, these metrics frequently fail to capture the deeper rea

Publication Details

Journal
Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13016/m2wonm-t1uk
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking LLMs for Real-World Applications: From Numerical Metrics to Contextual and Qualitative Evaluation

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Benchmarking LLMs for Real-World Applications: From Numerical Metrics to Contextual and Qualitative Evaluation

article en

Abstract

The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has traditionally relied on static benchmarks that prioritize performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, BLEU and standardized tests. However, these metrics frequently fail to capture the deeper rea

Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.