Life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing process: A systematic literature

Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing is a breakthrough in the industrial world, providing freedom to create designs that have never existed before and achieve high material efficiency. Nevertheless, it turns out that additive manufacturing still faces significant challenges, particularly in terms of energy consumption and emissions during production. This study conducted a systematic literature review to assess the environmental impact of AM technology using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. This study analyzes 80 articles from the Scopus database using VOSviewer software to identify research trends over the past ten years, knowledge gaps, and the challenges faced in implementing sustainable AM. The study results indicate that although the AM method has proven more efficient in material utilization than conventional methods, environmental challenges such as material waste and greenhouse gas emissions produced require further investigation. This study emphasizes the importance of ISO 14044:2006 standards in LCA to evaluate environmental impacts more comprehensively and to support more sustainable decision-making in implementing this technology. This study provides important insights for future studies to focus on reducing the negative environmental effects of the AM process to enhance sustainability in manufacturing processes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17365206
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing process: A systematic literature

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing process: A systematic literature

article en

Abstract

Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing is a breakthrough in the industrial world, providing freedom to create designs that have never existed before and achieve high material efficiency. Nevertheless, it turns out that additive manufacturing still faces significant challenges, particularly in terms of energy consumption and emissions during production. This study conducted a systematic literature review to assess the environmental impact of AM technology using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. This study analyzes 80 articles from the Scopus database using VOSviewer software to identify research trends over the past ten years, knowledge gaps, and the challenges faced in implementing sustainable AM. The study results indicate that although the AM method has proven more efficient in material utilization than conventional methods, environmental challenges such as material waste and greenhouse gas emissions produced require further investigation. This study emphasizes the importance of ISO 14044:2006 standards in LCA to evaluate environmental impacts more comprehensively and to support more sustainable decision-making in implementing this technology. This study provides important insights for future studies to focus on reducing the negative environmental effects of the AM process to enhance sustainability in manufacturing processes.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Diponegoro University (ID)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.