What is a Data Document? Analyzing Four Emerging Data Documentation Frameworks in <scp>AI</scp> / <scp>ML</scp>

ABSTRACT Documentation of datasets is a longstanding concern for data curation and research data management. Additionally, work in AI ethics, fairness, accountability, and transparency has taken on the challenge of documenting and describing datasets used to train or test machine learning models, though with few overlaps or points of intersection with information science approaches. In order to foster increased conversation and collaboration across fields, I aim here to both assess the current landscape of AI's data documentation frameworks and understand where shared interests with RDM might be possible and fruitful. I analyze four prominent frameworks for documenting AI datasets, considering: (a) their goals, influences and precedents; (b) formal qualities of their materiality, and, (c) noting where and how each framework has been adopted and applied. Results reveal some common features of documentation frameworks, as well as diverging goals and constraints. I close by reflecting on ways that information science might learn from these approaches stemming from AI to inform future work on documentation of datasets for scientific research and beyond.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1270
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is a Data Document? Analyzing Four Emerging Data Documentation Frameworks in AI / ML

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Research Data Management Practices
article

What is a Data Document? Analyzing Four Emerging Data Documentation Frameworks in AI / ML

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Documentation of datasets is a longstanding concern for data curation and research data management. Additionally, work in AI ethics, fairness, accountability, and transparency has taken on the challenge of documenting and describing datasets used to train or test machine learning models, though with few overlaps or points of intersection with information science approaches. In order to foster increased conversation and collaboration across fields, I aim here to both assess the current landscape of AI's data documentation frameworks and understand where shared interests with RDM might be possible and fruitful. I analyze four prominent frameworks for documenting AI datasets, considering: (a) their goals, influences and precedents; (b) formal qualities of their materiality, and, (c) noting where and how each framework has been adopted and applied. Results reveal some common features of documentation frameworks, as well as diverging goals and constraints. I close by reflecting on ways that information science might learn from these approaches stemming from AI to inform future work on documentation of datasets for scientific research and beyond.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.