“Digital Friend” or “It”? Conceptualizations of <scp>LLM</scp> ‐Powered Chatbots in National Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Crisis Hotlines

ABSTRACT This paper reports on the use of chatbots among US‐based, national sexual assault and domestic violence hotlines, and examines how these chatbots are conceptualized. Because chatbots are indifferent to their outputs but survivors in crisis/danger require trauma‐informed, empathetic support, it is important to understand how hotlines conceptualize their chatbots and present them to survivors. Through qualitative content analysis of supporting documentation about the chatbots, this project found that the hotlines describe similar purposes of the chatbots and state the chatbots are not replacements for live services. However, the hotlines diverge in how they refer to the chatbots (“it” vs. “she” / “digital friend”) and in what features the chatbot offers. The use of “she” and “digital friend,” and the knowledge and skills required by some purported features of the chatbots blur the line between the chatbot being a simple, information retrieval tool and human‐like enough to replace trained, live support.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1349
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Digital Friend” or “It”? Conceptualizations of LLM ‐Powered Chatbots in National Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Crisis Hotlines

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
AI in Service Interactions
article

“Digital Friend” or “It”? Conceptualizations of LLM ‐Powered Chatbots in National Sexual Assault and Domestic Violence Crisis Hotlines

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper reports on the use of chatbots among US‐based, national sexual assault and domestic violence hotlines, and examines how these chatbots are conceptualized. Because chatbots are indifferent to their outputs but survivors in crisis/danger require trauma‐informed, empathetic support, it is important to understand how hotlines conceptualize their chatbots and present them to survivors. Through qualitative content analysis of supporting documentation about the chatbots, this project found that the hotlines describe similar purposes of the chatbots and state the chatbots are not replacements for live services. However, the hotlines diverge in how they refer to the chatbots (“it” vs. “she” / “digital friend”) and in what features the chatbot offers. The use of “she” and “digital friend,” and the knowledge and skills required by some purported features of the chatbots blur the line between the chatbot being a simple, information retrieval tool and human‐like enough to replace trained, live support.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.