The digital data double standard: economic value extraction versus scientific knowledge limitation and the opportunities of data donation

Social science research with digital data faces ethical and technical challenges, often intensified by Research Ethics Committees (RECs). While RECs provide oversight, their criteria - rooted in medical fields - may not align with social research, especially in qualitative studies. This paper introduces the concept of a “digital data double standard,” highlighting how private platforms exploit vast user data while researchers face strict access limitations. In the post-API era, alternative methods like scraping and tracking are explored, with “data donation” emerging as a promising solution. This approach allows users to voluntarily share their digital traces, balancing ethical compliance and research needs. By embracing data donation, RECs could better sup-port digital social research, addressing the growing gap between corporate data use and academic inquiry.

Publication Details

Journal
Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano)
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13131/unipi/dx59-1n53
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The digital data double standard: economic value extraction versus scientific knowledge limitation and the opportunities of data donation

Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano)
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

The digital data double standard: economic value extraction versus scientific knowledge limitation and the opportunities of data donation

article en

Abstract

Social science research with digital data faces ethical and technical challenges, often intensified by Research Ethics Committees (RECs). While RECs provide oversight, their criteria - rooted in medical fields - may not align with social research, especially in qualitative studies. This paper introduces the concept of a “digital data double standard,” highlighting how private platforms exploit vast user data while researchers face strict access limitations. In the post-API era, alternative methods like scraping and tracking are explored, with “data donation” emerging as a promising solution. This approach allows users to voluntarily share their digital traces, balancing ethical compliance and research needs. By embracing data donation, RECs could better sup-port digital social research, addressing the growing gap between corporate data use and academic inquiry.

Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.