Human‐ <scp>AI</scp> Interaction Data Governance in Personal Health Management: Literature and Cases Analysis

ABSTRACT This study investigates data risks in human‐AI interaction within personal health management apps and systems. Drawing on literature, cases, and policies, it analyses data types, governance practices, and potential risks. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) guidelines and thematic analysis, 116 articles, 9 cases, and 4 key policies were examined. Identified data types include physiological indicators, lifestyle habits, personal identity, and social relations. Governance practices and risks are categorised into six dimensions: governance subjects, policies and standards, technologies and facilities, lifecycle measures, data rights protection, and risk management. The study offers governance strategies for human‐centred AI and lays the groundwork for further assessment of risk types and severity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1469
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human‐ AI Interaction Data Governance in Personal Health Management: Literature and Cases Analysis

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human‐ AI Interaction Data Governance in Personal Health Management: Literature and Cases Analysis

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study investigates data risks in human‐AI interaction within personal health management apps and systems. Drawing on literature, cases, and policies, it analyses data types, governance practices, and potential risks. Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses) guidelines and thematic analysis, 116 articles, 9 cases, and 4 key policies were examined. Identified data types include physiological indicators, lifestyle habits, personal identity, and social relations. Governance practices and risks are categorised into six dimensions: governance subjects, policies and standards, technologies and facilities, lifecycle measures, data rights protection, and risk management. The study offers governance strategies for human‐centred AI and lays the groundwork for further assessment of risk types and severity.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Wuhan University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.