Understanding Students' Perceptions of Ethics in <scp>AI</scp> Use through the Lens of Floridi's Unified Framework of Ethical Principles for <scp>AI</scp>

ABSTRACT Explorations of AI use in higher education have included ethical concerns, though primarily have taken a broad view, focusing on concerns with academic integrity and plagiarism. More nuanced explorations into the ethics of AI use, especially from a qualitative perspective, have been lacking. Utilizing Floridi's unified framework of ethical principles for AI as a guide, this study addresses this gap with a qualitative exploration of undergraduate students' perceptions of the ethical underpinnings of AI tools in the context of use for course work completion. Findings suggest that beneficence, non‐maleficence, and autonomy are clearly present in students' perceptions of ethics in AI, but justice and explicability were not. This suggests a deeper understanding of ethics in AI use beyond fear of plagiarism, but a noted lack of understanding around the true nature or impact of AI. These findings invite additional research around students' understanding of AI and the inclusion of faculty.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1244
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Students' Perceptions of Ethics in AI Use through the Lens of Floridi's Unified Framework of Ethical Principles for AI

1 citations
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
article

Understanding Students' Perceptions of Ethics in AI Use through the Lens of Floridi's Unified Framework of Ethical Principles for AI

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Explorations of AI use in higher education have included ethical concerns, though primarily have taken a broad view, focusing on concerns with academic integrity and plagiarism. More nuanced explorations into the ethics of AI use, especially from a qualitative perspective, have been lacking. Utilizing Floridi's unified framework of ethical principles for AI as a guide, this study addresses this gap with a qualitative exploration of undergraduate students' perceptions of the ethical underpinnings of AI tools in the context of use for course work completion. Findings suggest that beneficence, non‐maleficence, and autonomy are clearly present in students' perceptions of ethics in AI, but justice and explicability were not. This suggests a deeper understanding of ethics in AI use beyond fear of plagiarism, but a noted lack of understanding around the true nature or impact of AI. These findings invite additional research around students' understanding of AI and the inclusion of faculty.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University of South Carolina (US), East Carolina University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.