Representation and Authenticity in <scp>AI</scp> Generated, Curated, and Mediated Archives

ABSTRACT Archival and information science scholars have begun to evaluate the impact of AI tools on how archival objects are created, used, and evaluated (Shinde, Kirstein, Ghosh, and Franks, 2024). Researchers have addressed a broad range of questions, including the evidential properties of AI generated archives, the use of large language models in supporting archival processing, and strategies for evaluating the authenticity and reliability of AI generated archives (Jaillant and Caputo, 2022; Reducindo and Olague, 2024; Wagner and Blewer, 2019). This initial work represented in the poster indicates a need to investigate questions pertaining to the evidential foundations and societal impacts of AI generated and mediated archives, and the potential and existing requirements for AI tools to enhance use of legacy and born‐digital archival sources. This is significant for supporting traditional archival objectives in providing for and assessing reliability and authenticity (Arias Hernández and Rockembach, 2025). These issues are present at multiple stages of the archival life cycle – records creation, access, and evaluation and use – and are introduced and discussed broadly in this poster.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1498
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representation and Authenticity in AI Generated, Curated, and Mediated Archives

1 citations
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
6.15
article

Representation and Authenticity in AI Generated, Curated, and Mediated Archives

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Archival and information science scholars have begun to evaluate the impact of AI tools on how archival objects are created, used, and evaluated (Shinde, Kirstein, Ghosh, and Franks, 2024). Researchers have addressed a broad range of questions, including the evidential properties of AI generated archives, the use of large language models in supporting archival processing, and strategies for evaluating the authenticity and reliability of AI generated archives (Jaillant and Caputo, 2022; Reducindo and Olague, 2024; Wagner and Blewer, 2019). This initial work represented in the poster indicates a need to investigate questions pertaining to the evidential foundations and societal impacts of AI generated and mediated archives, and the potential and existing requirements for AI tools to enhance use of legacy and born‐digital archival sources. This is significant for supporting traditional archival objectives in providing for and assessing reliability and authenticity (Arias Hernández and Rockembach, 2025). These issues are present at multiple stages of the archival life cycle – records creation, access, and evaluation and use – and are introduced and discussed broadly in this poster.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University of Arizona (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Alabama (US), San Diego State University (US), Drexel University (US)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
6.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.