Knowledge Breadth and Depth Measurement of Large Language Models ( <scp>LLMs</scp> )

ABSTRACT This study constructed an integrated framework for measuring LLMs' knowledge breadth (able to cover multiple fields) and depth (able to handle complex problems) and perform calculations based on evidence. The current research evidence on measuring LLMs was obtained through a systematic review. Then, an integrated framework based on the matching of capability and task was constructed, where the generation capability and knowledge management task reflect the knowledge breadth, while other capabilities and tasks reflect the knowledge depth. Knowledge breadth and depth were measured through Coverage and Revealed Technological Advantage. The results showed that 36 matches of capability and task were selected from representative papers, and the knowledge breadth and depth panorama of LLMs was displayed. Furthermore, there is no absolute advantage or disadvantage in LLMs. This study clarifies the boundaries of the LLM's measurement, and the framework further ensures the diversity of benchmark models and avoids redundancy and misalignment biases.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1273
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Knowledge Breadth and Depth Measurement of Large Language Models ( LLMs )

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Knowledge Breadth and Depth Measurement of Large Language Models ( LLMs )

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study constructed an integrated framework for measuring LLMs' knowledge breadth (able to cover multiple fields) and depth (able to handle complex problems) and perform calculations based on evidence. The current research evidence on measuring LLMs was obtained through a systematic review. Then, an integrated framework based on the matching of capability and task was constructed, where the generation capability and knowledge management task reflect the knowledge breadth, while other capabilities and tasks reflect the knowledge depth. Knowledge breadth and depth were measured through Coverage and Revealed Technological Advantage. The results showed that 36 matches of capability and task were selected from representative papers, and the knowledge breadth and depth panorama of LLMs was displayed. Furthermore, there is no absolute advantage or disadvantage in LLMs. This study clarifies the boundaries of the LLM's measurement, and the framework further ensures the diversity of benchmark models and avoids redundancy and misalignment biases.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Wuhan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Knowledge Breadth and Depth Measurement of Large Language Models ( <scp>LLMs</scp> ) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS