Is <scp>AIGC</scp> Technology Useful? A Comparative Analysis of Search Technologies for Online Museums

ABSTRACT This study explored whether the application of generative search (GS) techniques—including RAG, COT, and RAT—is superior to traditional keyword search (KS) techniques in digital museum scenarios. We constructed a prototype search system using 800 painting collections from the digital collection repository platform of the Palace Museum in Beijing. Sixteen users performed factual, explanatory, and exploratory search tasks while evaluating five search methods, including KS and various GS optimizations. The experiment results reveal that GS performs better than KS, despite challenges with user satisfaction and search accuracy because of vague responses and occasional hallucinations. Among GS techniques, RAT—integrating chain‐of‐thought reasoning with document retrieval—achieved the best overall performance. The findings help overcome current search challenges in digital cultural heritage and provide practical guidance for advancing the intelligent development of online museums.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1362
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is AIGC Technology Useful? A Comparative Analysis of Search Technologies for Online Museums

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Is AIGC Technology Useful? A Comparative Analysis of Search Technologies for Online Museums

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored whether the application of generative search (GS) techniques—including RAG, COT, and RAT—is superior to traditional keyword search (KS) techniques in digital museum scenarios. We constructed a prototype search system using 800 painting collections from the digital collection repository platform of the Palace Museum in Beijing. Sixteen users performed factual, explanatory, and exploratory search tasks while evaluating five search methods, including KS and various GS optimizations. The experiment results reveal that GS performs better than KS, despite challenges with user satisfaction and search accuracy because of vague responses and occasional hallucinations. Among GS techniques, RAT—integrating chain‐of‐thought reasoning with document retrieval—achieved the best overall performance. The findings help overcome current search challenges in digital cultural heritage and provide practical guidance for advancing the intelligent development of online museums.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Renmin University of China (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Is <scp>AIGC</scp> Technology Useful? A Comparative Analysis of Search Technologies for Online Museums · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS