Melting the Moon: First High-Temperature Calorimetry of Apollo Soils

High-T regolith heat capacity underpins in situ resource utilization (ISRU), sintering, melt-processing, thermal-conductivity models, and impact melt behavior. However, prior studies were confined to low-temperature (<100°C), non-destructive Cp measurements, qualitative DTA, EGA-focused analysis, or simulant-based, until now. We present the first high-T differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on six Apollo soils (30°C/min, 1625°C), to our knowledge, the first complete melting of Apollo 16 regolith. One mare (Apollo 11: 10084.2095) and five highland (Apollo 16: 64501.16; 64801.189; 65701.159; 67711.14; 68841.133). All Apollo 16 soils exhibit similar thermodynamic properties with reproducible bimodal melting behavior. Stone Mountain soils show a prominent anorthosite peak near ~1405°C, while others have a stronger norite melting peak around ~1259°C. The Apollo 16 average enthalpy of fusion is 539± 86J/g (2σ) and liquidus 1545 ± 14°C (2σ). 10084 is lower at 432 ± 146 J/g (2σ) and 1314 ± 1°C (2σ). The average liquid heat capacity of all bulk Apollo 16 melts is 1.50 ± 0.17 J/g (2σ). After melting and holding at 1625°C for 25 minutes, 10084 crystallized spherulites on cooling (1125-800°C, peak 986°C), while all Apollo 16 melts quenched to glass. On reheating, all Apollo 16 showed similar glass transition peaks at 790 ± 28°C (2σ), followed by crystallization troughs, melting peaks at ~1180°C and ~1320°C, and liquidus near ~1307 ± 23°C (2σ). Notably, 67711 and 64501 recrystallized ~5x more strongly than others, releasing -201 ± 62 J/g (2σ).All Apollo soils are significantly glassy and space-weathered, exhibiting two exothermic crystallization events below 1000°C: a low-T interval (~350-650°C) we attribute to extremely metastable, irradiated and vapor-deposited rims (contributing roughly one-third of the released energy), and a post-Tg interval (~780-980 °C) from impact-melt glass. These data indicate lunar soils are highly metastable and amorphous, with Apollo 16 averaging a total crystallization enthalpy of -75 ± 16 J/g (1σ). Total glass content estimation is complicated by multiple crystallization steps, but enthalpy-based methods with our data currently suggest >20 wt.% glass in Apollo soils. Sintering-relevant melt onsets further differentiate the soils: Apollo 16 shows bimodal melting at ~1259°C (noritic onset) and ~1404°C (An melts), whereas Apollo 11 10084 exhibits a single melting peak at ~1144°C.NOTE: Abstract updated from the original GSA submission as additional data were gathered and integrated into this poster.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17372277
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Melting the Moon: First High-Temperature Calorimetry of Apollo Soils

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Melting the Moon: First High-Temperature Calorimetry of Apollo Soils

article en

Abstract

High-T regolith heat capacity underpins in situ resource utilization (ISRU), sintering, melt-processing, thermal-conductivity models, and impact melt behavior. However, prior studies were confined to low-temperature (<100°C), non-destructive Cp measurements, qualitative DTA, EGA-focused analysis, or simulant-based, until now. We present the first high-T differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) on six Apollo soils (30°C/min, 1625°C), to our knowledge, the first complete melting of Apollo 16 regolith. One mare (Apollo 11: 10084.2095) and five highland (Apollo 16: 64501.16; 64801.189; 65701.159; 67711.14; 68841.133). All Apollo 16 soils exhibit similar thermodynamic properties with reproducible bimodal melting behavior. Stone Mountain soils show a prominent anorthosite peak near ~1405°C, while others have a stronger norite melting peak around ~1259°C. The Apollo 16 average enthalpy of fusion is 539± 86J/g (2σ) and liquidus 1545 ± 14°C (2σ). 10084 is lower at 432 ± 146 J/g (2σ) and 1314 ± 1°C (2σ). The average liquid heat capacity of all bulk Apollo 16 melts is 1.50 ± 0.17 J/g (2σ). After melting and holding at 1625°C for 25 minutes, 10084 crystallized spherulites on cooling (1125-800°C, peak 986°C), while all Apollo 16 melts quenched to glass. On reheating, all Apollo 16 showed similar glass transition peaks at 790 ± 28°C (2σ), followed by crystallization troughs, melting peaks at ~1180°C and ~1320°C, and liquidus near ~1307 ± 23°C (2σ). Notably, 67711 and 64501 recrystallized ~5x more strongly than others, releasing -201 ± 62 J/g (2σ).All Apollo soils are significantly glassy and space-weathered, exhibiting two exothermic crystallization events below 1000°C: a low-T interval (~350-650°C) we attribute to extremely metastable, irradiated and vapor-deposited rims (contributing roughly one-third of the released energy), and a post-Tg interval (~780-980 °C) from impact-melt glass. These data indicate lunar soils are highly metastable and amorphous, with Apollo 16 averaging a total crystallization enthalpy of -75 ± 16 J/g (1σ). Total glass content estimation is complicated by multiple crystallization steps, but enthalpy-based methods with our data currently suggest >20 wt.% glass in Apollo soils. Sintering-relevant melt onsets further differentiate the soils: Apollo 16 shows bimodal melting at ~1259°C (noritic onset) and ~1404°C (An melts), whereas Apollo 11 10084 exhibits a single melting peak at ~1144°C.NOTE: Abstract updated from the original GSA submission as additional data were gathered and integrated into this poster.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marshall Space Flight Center (US), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.