Risk Management Framework-Based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for AI Risk Assessment

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to spread into human life, developers must ensure benefits while minimizing the risk of adverse impacts. This study aims to evaluate risks in real-world AI applications using the AI Incident Database. It employs Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and the National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework to identify failures, their causes and effects, and assess how current systems address them. A total of 100 incident reports were analyzed. The findings indicate frequent failures in autonomous systems and biased predictions. Seven cases were classified in the highest risk categories, including those involving physical harm and loss of life. Over 80% failures originated from algorithmic flaws or poor data quality. The method employed successfully evaluates the risks in current AI applications, revealing critical gaps in risk management and emphasizing the urgent need for targeted safeguards and proactive mitigation strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Technology Innovation
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46604/aiti.2025.14609
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Management Framework-Based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for AI Risk Assessment

Advances in Technology Innovation
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Risk Management Framework-Based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis for AI Risk Assessment

article en

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) technologies continue to spread into human life, developers must ensure benefits while minimizing the risk of adverse impacts. This study aims to evaluate risks in real-world AI applications using the AI Incident Database. It employs Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and the National Institute of Standards and Technology AI Risk Management Framework to identify failures, their causes and effects, and assess how current systems address them. A total of 100 incident reports were analyzed. The findings indicate frequent failures in autonomous systems and biased predictions. Seven cases were classified in the highest risk categories, including those involving physical harm and loss of life. Over 80% failures originated from algorithmic flaws or poor data quality. The method employed successfully evaluates the risks in current AI applications, revealing critical gaps in risk management and emphasizing the urgent need for targeted safeguards and proactive mitigation strategies.

Advances in Technology InnovationVol. 10(4)
Badan Pusat Statistik (ID), Statistical Service (CY), University of Yamanashi (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.