A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations

ABSTRACT The panel examines approaches to working with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations across all stages of the qualitative research process, beginning with project scoping and obtaining the institutional review board approval to member checking with participants and reporting out findings. The panel identifies tension between institutional mandates for research and the ethical commitments scholars make to their participants and those participants’ broader communities. Avoiding a perfect solution to ethical methods of research, this panel instead identifies strategies and tools for ensuring that such research affirms and enhances the lived experiences of these populations, while avoiding extractive and deficit‐based models of scholarly inquiry. The panel utilizes case studies from the respective panelists about their challenges and successes working with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations. The panel includes a group discussion led by the panelists on pending questions of researching with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations. This group discussion will involve an opportunity for members of the audience to ask questions and share their experiences with similar research endeavors. To make the most of the time together, the panelists will also compile resources highlighted within the group discussions and share those resources with attendees during and after the conference.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1384
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The panel examines approaches to working with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations across all stages of the qualitative research process, beginning with project scoping and obtaining the institutional review board approval to member checking with participants and reporting out findings. The panel identifies tension between institutional mandates for research and the ethical commitments scholars make to their participants and those participants’ broader communities. Avoiding a perfect solution to ethical methods of research, this panel instead identifies strategies and tools for ensuring that such research affirms and enhances the lived experiences of these populations, while avoiding extractive and deficit‐based models of scholarly inquiry. The panel utilizes case studies from the respective panelists about their challenges and successes working with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations. The panel includes a group discussion led by the panelists on pending questions of researching with “difficult”‐to‐reach populations. This group discussion will involve an opportunity for members of the audience to ask questions and share their experiences with similar research endeavors. To make the most of the time together, the panelists will also compile resources highlighted within the group discussions and share those resources with attendees during and after the conference.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Western University (CA), University of Kentucky (US), University of South Carolina (US), University of Illinois System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Critical Dialogue on Ethics and Practices for Digital Research with “Difficult” to Reach Populations · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS