Reconcilable Differences: Comparative Analysis of <scp>EU</scp> and <scp>US</scp> Ethical <scp>AI</scp> Frameworks with Focus on Divergent Ethical Aspects

ABSTRACT The impact of AI on information environments has prompted questions around its ethical regulation, and alignment with the EU AI Act is increasingly necessary. As the first AI regulation in the world, combined with the Brussels effect, the EU is a global AI regulatory leader. This context is compounded by the volatility of other global powers. Information sciences can make unique contributions to policy development with its focus at the intersection of information, technology, and people. This paper reports on the second phase of a project, initiated in 2023, analyzing ethical similarities and differences between the EU's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI and the US' AI Bill of Rights, using qualitative content analysis. Findings demonstrate that ethical differences can be resolved while accounting for similarities. Implications suggest collective need for international cooperation and compliance. This paper provides a case study for detailed info‐ethical analysis for regulatory alignment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1274
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconcilable Differences: Comparative Analysis of EU and US Ethical AI Frameworks with Focus on Divergent Ethical Aspects

1 citations
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Reconcilable Differences: Comparative Analysis of EU and US Ethical AI Frameworks with Focus on Divergent Ethical Aspects

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The impact of AI on information environments has prompted questions around its ethical regulation, and alignment with the EU AI Act is increasingly necessary. As the first AI regulation in the world, combined with the Brussels effect, the EU is a global AI regulatory leader. This context is compounded by the volatility of other global powers. Information sciences can make unique contributions to policy development with its focus at the intersection of information, technology, and people. This paper reports on the second phase of a project, initiated in 2023, analyzing ethical similarities and differences between the EU's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI and the US' AI Bill of Rights, using qualitative content analysis. Findings demonstrate that ethical differences can be resolved while accounting for similarities. Implications suggest collective need for international cooperation and compliance. This paper provides a case study for detailed info‐ethical analysis for regulatory alignment.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
University of British Columbia (CA), Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reconcilable Differences: Comparative Analysis of <scp>EU</scp> and <scp>US</scp> Ethical <scp>AI</scp> Frameworks with Focus on Divergent Ethical Aspects · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS