Toward Agency‐Centered <scp>AI</scp> Literacy: A Scoping Review

ABSTRACT Digital literacy is well‐studied across disciplines, with established attention to core competencies and social inequalities. However, artificial intelligence (AI) literacy remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review on AI literacy to: (1) consolidate current definitions and pinpoint conceptual gaps, (2) evaluate methodological approaches and their relevance in practice, and (3) examine how social inequalities are considered in AI literacy studies. Definitions of AI literacy are inconsistent across and within disciplines, and most studies do not consider social factors. Most definitions focus on knowledge and skill acquisition, framing AI literacy as a suite of acquired competencies. We argue that current understandings of AI literacy need to expand to include informed decision‐making, critical engagement, and resistance to technological coercion by taking an agency‐driven approach. These insights can guide researchers, educators, and policymakers in fostering an agency‐centered AI literacy that empowers individuals in an increasingly AI‐mediated world.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1472
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Architecture and Urbanism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Agency‐Centered AI Literacy: A Scoping Review

1 citations
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Historical Architecture and Urbanism
38.00
article

Toward Agency‐Centered AI Literacy: A Scoping Review

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital literacy is well‐studied across disciplines, with established attention to core competencies and social inequalities. However, artificial intelligence (AI) literacy remains underexplored. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review on AI literacy to: (1) consolidate current definitions and pinpoint conceptual gaps, (2) evaluate methodological approaches and their relevance in practice, and (3) examine how social inequalities are considered in AI literacy studies. Definitions of AI literacy are inconsistent across and within disciplines, and most studies do not consider social factors. Most definitions focus on knowledge and skill acquisition, framing AI literacy as a suite of acquired competencies. We argue that current understandings of AI literacy need to expand to include informed decision‐making, critical engagement, and resistance to technological coercion by taking an agency‐driven approach. These insights can guide researchers, educators, and policymakers in fostering an agency‐centered AI literacy that empowers individuals in an increasingly AI‐mediated world.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Western University (CA), University of Plymouth (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Economic and Social Research Council
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Historical Architecture and Urbanism
38.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Toward Agency‐Centered <scp>AI</scp> Literacy: A Scoping Review · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS