Translation when There Is No Direct Equivalent—An Experimental Comparison of Different Translations of the Subjunctive Mood in the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale

Translating questionnaires is challenging when the source language structure lacks equivalents in the target language. Using item 8 (“I wish I could have more respect for myself”) of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, we experimentally compared three strategies for translating the subjunctive mood from English to Chinese: (1) a close translation preserving vocabulary and structure; (2) an adaptive translation explicitly expressing the self-esteem deficiency; and (3) a problematic yet widely used translation. Results showed the adaptive translation yielded better psychometric properties than the close translation and increased respondent alertness through explicit negative wording. Our findings suggest that the issues with item 8 in non-English samples likely stem from inappropriate translation rather than cross-cultural differences.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Methods
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x251363051
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Translation when There Is No Direct Equivalent—An Experimental Comparison of Different Translations of the Subjunctive Mood in the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale

Field Methods
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Translation when There Is No Direct Equivalent—An Experimental Comparison of Different Translations of the Subjunctive Mood in the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale

article en

Abstract

Translating questionnaires is challenging when the source language structure lacks equivalents in the target language. Using item 8 (“I wish I could have more respect for myself”) of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale, we experimentally compared three strategies for translating the subjunctive mood from English to Chinese: (1) a close translation preserving vocabulary and structure; (2) an adaptive translation explicitly expressing the self-esteem deficiency; and (3) a problematic yet widely used translation. Results showed the adaptive translation yielded better psychometric properties than the close translation and increased respondent alertness through explicit negative wording. Our findings suggest that the issues with item 8 in non-English samples likely stem from inappropriate translation rather than cross-cultural differences.

Field Methods
Tarim University (CN), University College London (GB), Zhejiang University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Translation when There Is No Direct Equivalent—An Experimental Comparison of Different Translations of the Subjunctive Mood in the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale · Field Methods (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS