The Future of Academic Writing in the Age of Generative <scp>AI</scp>

ABSTRACT The evolution of AI tools, such as ChatGPT and SciTE AI, has impacted academic writing by improving research output and simplifying tasks such as idea generation, drafting, and editing. While these tools offer benefits, such as supporting non‐English speaking individuals and persons with disabilities, they increase concerns regarding academic integrity, critical thinking, and creativity. A dependence on GenAI can negatively impact cognitive engagement and the growth of critical analysis and problem‐solving capacities. Furthermore, AI‐generated content blurs the lines between originality and authorship, emphasizing ethical concerns about plagiarism and intellectual property. This panel will discuss ways educational institutions can address these issues by developing comprehensive guidelines to support transparency and accountability in ethical AI use. The potential of AI to improve accessibility should be considered along with concerns over equitable access, as not all individuals have the same opportunities to access high‐quality AI tools. Balancing AI's benefits with risks is indispensable for its responsible integration into academic environments.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1374
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Future of Academic Writing in the Age of Generative AI

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Future of Academic Writing in the Age of Generative AI

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The evolution of AI tools, such as ChatGPT and SciTE AI, has impacted academic writing by improving research output and simplifying tasks such as idea generation, drafting, and editing. While these tools offer benefits, such as supporting non‐English speaking individuals and persons with disabilities, they increase concerns regarding academic integrity, critical thinking, and creativity. A dependence on GenAI can negatively impact cognitive engagement and the growth of critical analysis and problem‐solving capacities. Furthermore, AI‐generated content blurs the lines between originality and authorship, emphasizing ethical concerns about plagiarism and intellectual property. This panel will discuss ways educational institutions can address these issues by developing comprehensive guidelines to support transparency and accountability in ethical AI use. The potential of AI to improve accessibility should be considered along with concerns over equitable access, as not all individuals have the same opportunities to access high‐quality AI tools. Balancing AI's benefits with risks is indispensable for its responsible integration into academic environments.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Knoxville College (US), University of Warsaw (PL), San Jose State University (US), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Future of Academic Writing in the Age of Generative <scp>AI</scp> · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS