Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

This study compares the effectiveness of image-based and landmark-based methods for facial expression recognition (FER) in classifying hurt and normal facial expressions, utilizing datasets from the Delaware Pain Database and UTKFace. Five machine learning models are assessed, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest classifier (RFC), logistic regression classifier (LRC), and gradient boosting classifier (GBC). The findings indicate that CNN achieves the highest accuracy at 95% when using landmark-based features, while SVM and GBC also perform admirably with these features. Conversely, LRC exhibits inconsistent results, especially when relying on image-based features. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, guiding the selection of effective FER techniques.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Technology Innovation
Published
2025-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46604/aiti.2025.14589
Primary Topic
Emotion and Mood Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

Advances in Technology Innovation
Emotion and Mood Recognition
article

Comparative Analysis of Facial Expression Recognition Using Image-Based and Landmark-Based Methods

article en

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of image-based and landmark-based methods for facial expression recognition (FER) in classifying hurt and normal facial expressions, utilizing datasets from the Delaware Pain Database and UTKFace. Five machine learning models are assessed, including convolutional neural networks (CNN), support vector machines (SVM), random forest classifier (RFC), logistic regression classifier (LRC), and gradient boosting classifier (GBC). The findings indicate that CNN achieves the highest accuracy at 95% when using landmark-based features, while SVM and GBC also perform admirably with these features. Conversely, LRC exhibits inconsistent results, especially when relying on image-based features. These findings offer valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, guiding the selection of effective FER techniques.

Advances in Technology InnovationVol. 10(4)
Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Emotion and Mood Recognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.