Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade‐Offs around Generative <scp>AI</scp> Use

ABSTRACT Our goal is to advance our empirical understanding of the direct engagement of knowledge workers in academia with generative AI (Gen AI), as they are the thought leaders in our society. We interviewed 17 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of Gen AI from their perspective. Knowledge workers expressed worries about Gen AI undermining trust in the relationship between instructor and student and discussed potential solutions, such as pedagogy readiness, to mitigate them. Additionally, participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant. However, there were also concerns about potential social and power imbalances stemming from unequal access to such technologies. Our study offers insights into the concerns and hopes of knowledge workers about the ethical use of Gen AI in educational settings and beyond, with implications for navigating this new landscape.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1277
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade‐Offs around Generative AI Use

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade‐Offs around Generative AI Use

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Our goal is to advance our empirical understanding of the direct engagement of knowledge workers in academia with generative AI (Gen AI), as they are the thought leaders in our society. We interviewed 17 knowledge workers, including faculty and students, to investigate the social and technical dimensions of Gen AI from their perspective. Knowledge workers expressed worries about Gen AI undermining trust in the relationship between instructor and student and discussed potential solutions, such as pedagogy readiness, to mitigate them. Additionally, participants recognized Gen AI's potential to democratize knowledge by accelerating the learning process and act as an accessible research assistant. However, there were also concerns about potential social and power imbalances stemming from unequal access to such technologies. Our study offers insights into the concerns and hopes of knowledge workers about the ethical use of Gen AI in educational settings and beyond, with implications for navigating this new landscape.

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 62(1)
Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not a Swiss Army Knife: Academics' Perceptions of Trade‐Offs around Generative <scp>AI</scp> Use · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS