Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Refeeding Syndrome in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

Xue Zhan, Hao Wang, Ying Bai Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hao Wang, Email [email protected]: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a potentially life-threatening complication during nutritional rehabilitation in malnourished patients, especially those in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for assessing the risk of RFS in adult ICU patients.Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2022 to November 2023. Adult ICU patients at high risk for RFS, identified by nutritional assessment, were included. RFS was defined as a > 10% decrease in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium within 5 days after refeeding. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected from electronic medical records. For the biochemical data, the baseline (the day before refeeding), peak (highest measurements during the first five days after refeeding), and latest value (the fifth day after refeeding) value were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with stepwise selection, identified independent predictors. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve, AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with internal validation performed using bootstrap resampling.Results: A total of 132 ICU patients were included (RFS group, n=86; non-RFS group, n=46). Baseline characteristics, illness severity scores, and comorbidities, were generally comparable between groups. Multivariable analysis showed that higher peak urine epithelial cell count (OR=1.145, 95% CI: 1.023– 1.282), lower baseline total bilirubin (OR=0.969, 95% CI: 0.940– 1.000), lower peak potassium (OR=0.383, 95% CI: 0.147– 0.995), and lower latest relative lymphocyte count (OR=0.946, 95% CI: 0.897– 0.997) were independently associated with RFS risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.69– 0.87) and calibration. DCA indicated clinical utility across a range of risk thresholds.Conclusion: This internally validated model accurately predicts RFS risk in high-risk adult ICU patients, potentially improving early identification and individualized nutritional management. Further external validation is needed before wider clinical application.Keywords: refeeding syndrome, intensive care unit, nomogram, prediction, decision curve analysis

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Refeeding Syndrome in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

Development and Internal Validation of a Clinical Prediction Model for Refeeding Syndrome in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

article en

Abstract

Xue Zhan, Hao Wang, Ying Bai Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Hao Wang, Email [email protected]: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is a potentially life-threatening complication during nutritional rehabilitation in malnourished patients, especially those in intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to develop and internally validate a clinical prediction model for assessing the risk of RFS in adult ICU patients.Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from January 2022 to November 2023. Adult ICU patients at high risk for RFS, identified by nutritional assessment, were included. RFS was defined as a > 10% decrease in serum phosphorus, potassium, or magnesium within 5 days after refeeding. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected from electronic medical records. For the biochemical data, the baseline (the day before refeeding), peak (highest measurements during the first five days after refeeding), and latest value (the fifth day after refeeding) value were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression, with stepwise selection, identified independent predictors. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (area under the curve, AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), with internal validation performed using bootstrap resampling.Results: A total of 132 ICU patients were included (RFS group, n=86; non-RFS group, n=46). Baseline characteristics, illness severity scores, and comorbidities, were generally comparable between groups. Multivariable analysis showed that higher peak urine epithelial cell count (OR=1.145, 95% CI: 1.023– 1.282), lower baseline total bilirubin (OR=0.969, 95% CI: 0.940– 1.000), lower peak potassium (OR=0.383, 95% CI: 0.147– 0.995), and lower latest relative lymphocyte count (OR=0.946, 95% CI: 0.897– 0.997) were independently associated with RFS risk. The model demonstrated good discrimination (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.69– 0.87) and calibration. DCA indicated clinical utility across a range of risk thresholds.Conclusion: This internally validated model accurately predicts RFS risk in high-risk adult ICU patients, potentially improving early identification and individualized nutritional management. Further external validation is needed before wider clinical application.Keywords: refeeding syndrome, intensive care unit, nomogram, prediction, decision curve analysis

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.