Comparison of Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate with Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate in Children with Acute Asthma

Background: Acute asthma is a frequent cause of pediatric emergency admissions, requiring prompt management to relieve airway obstruction and prevent respiratory failure. Magnesium sulphate, administered either intravenously or via nebulization, has been used as an adjunct to standard bronchodilator therapy due to its bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulphate with intravenous magnesium sulphate in children presenting with acute moderate-to-severe asthma. Methodology: A total of 148 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthma were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group received intravenous (IV) magnesium sulphate and the other nebulized magnesium sulphate, in addition to standard asthma therapy. The Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS) was recorded at baseline, and at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes. The duration of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay, total hospital stay, treatment efficacy, and adverse effects were compared between groups. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Both treatments significantly improved PAS over time, with a faster initial reduction at 30 minutes in the nebulized group (9.53 ± 2.44 vs. 10.32 ± 2.13; p = 0.036). The mean PICU stay was shorter in the nebulized group (3.32 ± 4.23 vs. 5.94 ± 9.78 hours; p = 0.036), as was total hospital stay (28.76 ± 19.21 vs. 47.08 ± 42.71 hours; p = 0.001). Treatment efficacy was similar between groups (p = 0.069). Adverse effects occurred in 29.7% of IV-treated patients but in none of the nebulized group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Nebulized magnesium sulphate provides comparable therapeutic efficacy to intravenous administration while offering faster initial improvement, shorter recovery, and a superior safety profile. It represents a safe, effective, and practical alternative for managing acute asthma in children.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Published
2025-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v20i4.715
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate with Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate in Children with Acute Asthma

Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Efficacy of Nebulized Magnesium Sulphate with Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate in Children with Acute Asthma

article en

Abstract

Background: Acute asthma is a frequent cause of pediatric emergency admissions, requiring prompt management to relieve airway obstruction and prevent respiratory failure. Magnesium sulphate, administered either intravenously or via nebulization, has been used as an adjunct to standard bronchodilator therapy due to its bronchodilatory and anti-inflammatory effects. Objective: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulphate with intravenous magnesium sulphate in children presenting with acute moderate-to-severe asthma. Methodology: A total of 148 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthma were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups. One group received intravenous (IV) magnesium sulphate and the other nebulized magnesium sulphate, in addition to standard asthma therapy. The Pulmonary Asthma Score (PAS) was recorded at baseline, and at 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes. The duration of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) stay, total hospital stay, treatment efficacy, and adverse effects were compared between groups. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups (p > 0.05). Both treatments significantly improved PAS over time, with a faster initial reduction at 30 minutes in the nebulized group (9.53 ± 2.44 vs. 10.32 ± 2.13; p = 0.036). The mean PICU stay was shorter in the nebulized group (3.32 ± 4.23 vs. 5.94 ± 9.78 hours; p = 0.036), as was total hospital stay (28.76 ± 19.21 vs. 47.08 ± 42.71 hours; p = 0.001). Treatment efficacy was similar between groups (p = 0.069). Adverse effects occurred in 29.7% of IV-treated patients but in none of the nebulized group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Nebulized magnesium sulphate provides comparable therapeutic efficacy to intravenous administration while offering faster initial improvement, shorter recovery, and a superior safety profile. It represents a safe, effective, and practical alternative for managing acute asthma in children.

Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical UniversityVol. 20(4)
Polyclinic Medical Center (US), Aims Community College (US), Command Hospital (IN), Polyclinic General Hospital (GR), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.