Do Qualitative Research Methods ‘Count’?

The Social Sciences have a long, established positivist tradition, employing quantitative methods. Our understanding of human behaviour owes a great deal to quantitative researchers who collect vast quantities of survey or other numerical data. Such data provide insights into different populations by way of cross-sectional data analysis and through longitudinal studies that demonstrate how populations adapt to changing contexts. There is therefore no denying the utility of such research methods. Useful as they are, quantitative methods nonetheless have their limitations. They do not tell us much about profoundly, human experiences. To more meaningfully explore the depths of the human dimension, social scientists are increasingly embracing qualitative methods. These methods focus on small numbers of participants as opposed to the hundreds or thousands (and sometimes hundreds of thousands) of respondents that quantitative researchers employ. We present an argument for the use of qualitative methods to better understand human behaviour, alone or in conjunction with quantitative methods. We offer postgraduate researchers practical strategies for selecting methods, designing studies, integrating mixed-methods frameworks and addressing challenges such as ethical considerations, data management and selecting appropriate software tools. Researchers new to qualitative methods will find that they enhance understanding of unique human experiences.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PsyPag Quarterly
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspag.2025.1.129.35
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Qualitative Research Methods ‘Count’?

PsyPag Quarterly
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
article

Do Qualitative Research Methods ‘Count’?

article en

Abstract

The Social Sciences have a long, established positivist tradition, employing quantitative methods. Our understanding of human behaviour owes a great deal to quantitative researchers who collect vast quantities of survey or other numerical data. Such data provide insights into different populations by way of cross-sectional data analysis and through longitudinal studies that demonstrate how populations adapt to changing contexts. There is therefore no denying the utility of such research methods. Useful as they are, quantitative methods nonetheless have their limitations. They do not tell us much about profoundly, human experiences. To more meaningfully explore the depths of the human dimension, social scientists are increasingly embracing qualitative methods. These methods focus on small numbers of participants as opposed to the hundreds or thousands (and sometimes hundreds of thousands) of respondents that quantitative researchers employ. We present an argument for the use of qualitative methods to better understand human behaviour, alone or in conjunction with quantitative methods. We offer postgraduate researchers practical strategies for selecting methods, designing studies, integrating mixed-methods frameworks and addressing challenges such as ethical considerations, data management and selecting appropriate software tools. Researchers new to qualitative methods will find that they enhance understanding of unique human experiences.

PsyPag QuarterlyVol. 1(129)
University of Wolverhampton (GB), NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB), Wolverhampton Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Qualitative Research Methods ‘Count’? · PsyPag Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS