Walling Off Crime: An Analysis of the Local Deterrent Effects of Increased Border Control

Abstract This paper analyzes the deterrent effects of both border patrol agents and increased United States–Mexico fencing on reported crime rates in U.S. cities located along the border, between 1992 and 2016. We find that, for cities along the United States–Mexico border, increases in the number of border patrol agents, within patrol sectors, are associated with significant declines in property crime rates and that increased border fencing is associated with significant declines in both property and violent crime rates. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms provides evidence that border control measures are associated with significant reductions in the apprehension of migrants in the border region with prior convictions for other, non-migration-related crimes. The avoided crime indicated by the baseline estimates represents an annual economic benefit, ranging, on average, from $2,300 for an additional border patrol agent to $650,700 for an additional mile of in-city fencing, relative to an estimated cost of $174,000 to hire an agent and $2.8 million to install a mile of border fencing.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Law and Economics Review
Published
2025-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahae004
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Walling Off Crime: An Analysis of the Local Deterrent Effects of Increased Border Control

American Law and Economics Review
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Walling Off Crime: An Analysis of the Local Deterrent Effects of Increased Border Control

article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper analyzes the deterrent effects of both border patrol agents and increased United States–Mexico fencing on reported crime rates in U.S. cities located along the border, between 1992 and 2016. We find that, for cities along the United States–Mexico border, increases in the number of border patrol agents, within patrol sectors, are associated with significant declines in property crime rates and that increased border fencing is associated with significant declines in both property and violent crime rates. Further investigation into the underlying mechanisms provides evidence that border control measures are associated with significant reductions in the apprehension of migrants in the border region with prior convictions for other, non-migration-related crimes. The avoided crime indicated by the baseline estimates represents an annual economic benefit, ranging, on average, from $2,300 for an additional border patrol agent to $650,700 for an additional mile of in-city fencing, relative to an estimated cost of $174,000 to hire an agent and $2.8 million to install a mile of border fencing.

American Law and Economics Review
New Mexico State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Walling Off Crime: An Analysis of the Local Deterrent Effects of Increased Border Control · American Law and Economics Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS