A Study of Digital Access, Literacy, and Usage among Urban and Rural College Students

Purpose: This study investigates disparities in digital access, literacy, and academic technology usage between urban and rural college students in East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, India. It also examines the combined influence of digital access and literacy on students’ academic engagement. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative, descriptive, and comparative survey design was used. Data were collected from 51 undergraduate students selected through stratified random sampling from two urban and two rural colleges in India. A structured questionnaire with three dimensions digital access, digital literacy, and academic digital usage was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and multiple regression analysis. Findings: The results revealed no statistically significant mean differences between urban and rural students regarding digital access, literacy, or usage. However, cross-tabulation showed that urban students reported higher levels of access and literacy confidence, whereas rural students exhibited more variability and neutrality in their responses. Regression analysis indicated that both digital access and literacy significantly predicted academic digital usage (R² = 0.502, p < 0.001), with literacy being the stronger predictor. The findings underscore that skill proficiency, rather than mere connectivity, drives effective technology use in academic settings. Practical implications: This study highlights the need for dual-focus interventions enhancing both digital infrastructure and literacy skills especially in rural higher education institutions. Policymakers, educators, and community organizations should collaborate to improve connectivity, subsidize technology access, and embed digital literacy training into curricula to ensure equitable participation in the digital learning environment. Originality/value: This study provides empirical evidence of digital disparities in Meghalaya, an under-researched region of Northeast India. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the second-level digital divide by demonstrating that digital literacy has a stronger impact on academic engagement than access alone. The findings offer a region-specific foundation for policy and institutional strategies to promote digital equity in higher education.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17355869
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study of Digital Access, Literacy, and Usage among Urban and Rural College Students

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital literacy in education
article

A Study of Digital Access, Literacy, and Usage among Urban and Rural College Students

article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates disparities in digital access, literacy, and academic technology usage between urban and rural college students in East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, India. It also examines the combined influence of digital access and literacy on students’ academic engagement. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative, descriptive, and comparative survey design was used. Data were collected from 51 undergraduate students selected through stratified random sampling from two urban and two rural colleges in India. A structured questionnaire with three dimensions digital access, digital literacy, and academic digital usage was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and multiple regression analysis. Findings: The results revealed no statistically significant mean differences between urban and rural students regarding digital access, literacy, or usage. However, cross-tabulation showed that urban students reported higher levels of access and literacy confidence, whereas rural students exhibited more variability and neutrality in their responses. Regression analysis indicated that both digital access and literacy significantly predicted academic digital usage (R² = 0.502, p < 0.001), with literacy being the stronger predictor. The findings underscore that skill proficiency, rather than mere connectivity, drives effective technology use in academic settings. Practical implications: This study highlights the need for dual-focus interventions enhancing both digital infrastructure and literacy skills especially in rural higher education institutions. Policymakers, educators, and community organizations should collaborate to improve connectivity, subsidize technology access, and embed digital literacy training into curricula to ensure equitable participation in the digital learning environment. Originality/value: This study provides empirical evidence of digital disparities in Meghalaya, an under-researched region of Northeast India. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the second-level digital divide by demonstrating that digital literacy has a stronger impact on academic engagement than access alone. The findings offer a region-specific foundation for policy and institutional strategies to promote digital equity in higher education.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study of Digital Access, Literacy, and Usage among Urban and Rural College Students · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS