Leveraging machine learning with Bayesian optimization for optimizing feed spacer geometry using insights from predicting Sherwood and Power numbers

This study utilized machine learning (ML)-based models, including Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), to predict Sherwood number (<i>Sh</i>) and Power number (<i>Pn</i>) based on geometrical features of the feed spacers (i.e., α,β, and l/h) and crossflow rate (Re) of the membrane-based separation plants. The performance of each model was evaluated using key statistical metrics, including the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean square error (MSE). Results indicated CatBoost as the best-performing model, exhibiting <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of 0.9985 ± 0.0001 and 0.9958 ± 0.0017 for training and testing phases for <i>Sh</i>, whereas 0.9998 ± 0.0001 for training and 0.9945 ± 0.0029 for testing for <i>Pn</i>. Feature importance analysis highlighted the crucial influence of Re and l/h on output metrics. Bayesian optimization was used to maximize <i>Sh</i> while simultaneously minimizing <i>Pn</i>. The results suggest that lower values of α (ranging from 7.5° to 22.1°), mid-range values of β (86.2° to 95.7°), and lower values of l/h (between 3 and 4.1), along with a low cross-flow rate (<i>Re</i> ≈ 30), are optimum conditions. The results of the model prediction were compared with the published data.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30365707
Primary Topic
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging machine learning with Bayesian optimization for optimizing feed spacer geometry using insights from predicting Sherwood and Power numbers

Figshare
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
article

Leveraging machine learning with Bayesian optimization for optimizing feed spacer geometry using insights from predicting Sherwood and Power numbers

article en

Abstract

This study utilized machine learning (ML)-based models, including Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), to predict Sherwood number (<i>Sh</i>) and Power number (<i>Pn</i>) based on geometrical features of the feed spacers (i.e., α,β, and l/h) and crossflow rate (Re) of the membrane-based separation plants. The performance of each model was evaluated using key statistical metrics, including the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean square error (MSE). Results indicated CatBoost as the best-performing model, exhibiting <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> values of 0.9985 ± 0.0001 and 0.9958 ± 0.0017 for training and testing phases for <i>Sh</i>, whereas 0.9998 ± 0.0001 for training and 0.9945 ± 0.0029 for testing for <i>Pn</i>. Feature importance analysis highlighted the crucial influence of Re and l/h on output metrics. Bayesian optimization was used to maximize <i>Sh</i> while simultaneously minimizing <i>Pn</i>. The results suggest that lower values of α (ranging from 7.5° to 22.1°), mid-range values of β (86.2° to 95.7°), and lower values of l/h (between 3 and 4.1), along with a low cross-flow rate (<i>Re</i> ≈ 30), are optimum conditions. The results of the model prediction were compared with the published data.

Figshare
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Leveraging machine learning with Bayesian optimization for optimizing feed spacer geometry using insights from predicting Sherwood and Power numbers · Figshare (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS