Evaluation of Vertical Seismic Load Effects Specified in the United States Building Code

This study evaluates the efficacy of two alternative methods for estimating vertical seismic load effects (Ev), which are specified in United States building codes (e.g., ASCE 7-22) and guidelines, and employed in the seismic design of structures. In both approaches, the vertical seismic load is computed as a percentage of the nominal dead load. One method uses 20% of the horizontal short-period design spectral acceleration (SDS) as the dead load factor, while the other computes the dead load factor as 30% of the vertical spectral acceleration value at the (vertical) structural period of interest (Sav). The two approaches are evaluated and compared using (1) the results of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis carried out by the USGS (which is the backbone data for ASCE 7-22) for 19,316 sites in California, and (2) the NGA-West2 ground motion models for over 3,000 seismic scenarios. The results are presented in terms of the probability distribution of the ratio of the Ev values obtained from the two approaches (0.3Sav/0.2SDS) as a function of the vertical period of the structure. The evaluation reveals that the outcomes of applying the two methods are generally not consistent and depend significantly on the vertical period range of the structure. The study pinpoints period ranges where the results of one method substantially diverge from the other and provides recommendations for Ev calculations across various seismic design categories.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Structural Engineering
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jsendh.steng-14498
Primary Topic
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Vertical Seismic Load Effects Specified in the United States Building Code

Journal of Structural Engineering
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
article

Evaluation of Vertical Seismic Load Effects Specified in the United States Building Code

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy of two alternative methods for estimating vertical seismic load effects (Ev), which are specified in United States building codes (e.g., ASCE 7-22) and guidelines, and employed in the seismic design of structures. In both approaches, the vertical seismic load is computed as a percentage of the nominal dead load. One method uses 20% of the horizontal short-period design spectral acceleration (SDS) as the dead load factor, while the other computes the dead load factor as 30% of the vertical spectral acceleration value at the (vertical) structural period of interest (Sav). The two approaches are evaluated and compared using (1) the results of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis carried out by the USGS (which is the backbone data for ASCE 7-22) for 19,316 sites in California, and (2) the NGA-West2 ground motion models for over 3,000 seismic scenarios. The results are presented in terms of the probability distribution of the ratio of the Ev values obtained from the two approaches (0.3Sav/0.2SDS) as a function of the vertical period of the structure. The evaluation reveals that the outcomes of applying the two methods are generally not consistent and depend significantly on the vertical period range of the structure. The study pinpoints period ranges where the results of one method substantially diverge from the other and provides recommendations for Ev calculations across various seismic design categories.

Journal of Structural EngineeringVol. 151(12)
University of California System (US)
Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Diffusion and Search Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.