The effect of whole-body resistance exercise versus non-exercise on primary headaches: A scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis

Background Whole-body resistance exercise is a popular training method that enhances strength and muscle hypertrophy. Little is known about the effect of this type of exercise on primary headaches. This scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis aim to elucidate the existing state of knowledge of whole-body resistance exercise as a non-pharmacological treatment of primary headaches compared to non-exercise. Methods Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and the Cochrane handbook, we conducted a literature search in Embase, Medline, Amed, PEDro, and Web of Science. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane 2.0 tool to characterize the evidence base. An exploratory meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model. Results We identified notable gaps in the evidence base, with only two studies on migraine (18 participants) and vestibular migraine (286 participants), respectively, meeting the inclusion criteria. No studies were found for cluster headache or tension-type headache. The interventions consisted of 8 to 12 weeks of whole-body resistance exercise with two to three sessions per week, utilizing 45% to 80% of 1-repetition-maximum. The exploratory meta-analyses showed a standardized mean difference of −1.69 [95% CI −2.26, −1.13] for headache/vertigo intensity and −1,31 [95% CI −2.05, −0.56] for headache/vertigo frequency between exercise and no exercise. Quality assessments revealed major methodological limitations in both studies. Conclusion This scoping review identified substantial evidence gaps regarding whole-body resistance for primary headaches. While exploratory analyses suggest benefits for people with migraine, the limited and low-quality evidence base indicates a need for well-designed studies—particularly for tension-type headaches and cluster headaches. Trial registration The registration can be found under CRD42022343692 in PROSPERO. Registration details. Amendments from this protocol are explained in detail in the supplemental materials (Appendix 1).

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cephalalgia Reports
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/25158163251383149
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of whole-body resistance exercise versus non-exercise on primary headaches: A scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis

Cephalalgia Reports
Migraine and Headache Studies
article

The effect of whole-body resistance exercise versus non-exercise on primary headaches: A scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis

article en

Abstract

Background Whole-body resistance exercise is a popular training method that enhances strength and muscle hypertrophy. Little is known about the effect of this type of exercise on primary headaches. This scoping review and exploratory meta-analysis aim to elucidate the existing state of knowledge of whole-body resistance exercise as a non-pharmacological treatment of primary headaches compared to non-exercise. Methods Following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines and the Cochrane handbook, we conducted a literature search in Embase, Medline, Amed, PEDro, and Web of Science. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane 2.0 tool to characterize the evidence base. An exploratory meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effect model. Results We identified notable gaps in the evidence base, with only two studies on migraine (18 participants) and vestibular migraine (286 participants), respectively, meeting the inclusion criteria. No studies were found for cluster headache or tension-type headache. The interventions consisted of 8 to 12 weeks of whole-body resistance exercise with two to three sessions per week, utilizing 45% to 80% of 1-repetition-maximum. The exploratory meta-analyses showed a standardized mean difference of −1.69 [95% CI −2.26, −1.13] for headache/vertigo intensity and −1,31 [95% CI −2.05, −0.56] for headache/vertigo frequency between exercise and no exercise. Quality assessments revealed major methodological limitations in both studies. Conclusion This scoping review identified substantial evidence gaps regarding whole-body resistance for primary headaches. While exploratory analyses suggest benefits for people with migraine, the limited and low-quality evidence base indicates a need for well-designed studies—particularly for tension-type headaches and cluster headaches. Trial registration The registration can be found under CRD42022343692 in PROSPERO. Registration details. Amendments from this protocol are explained in detail in the supplemental materials (Appendix 1).

Cephalalgia ReportsVol. 8
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (NO), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Haukeland University Hospital (NO), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), St Olav's University Hospital (NO), University of Bergen (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Migraine and Headache Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.