Computational Experiential Monism (CEM): Dissolving the Hard Problem of Consciousness

This article presents a novel panexperientialist-computational theory that dissolves the "hard problem" of consciousness. We argue that subjective experience is not an emergent product of matter, but its intrinsic nature (The Identity Postulate). The hard problem arises from a categorical error: the projection of a "marker of inertness"—a cognitive heuristic that models the world as non-experiential—onto the brain itself. The framework is built on five core postulates: (1) Experience-Matter Identity, (2) The Marker of Inertness, (3) Phenomenal Specificity by Pattern, (4) Ownership Attribution Algorithms, and (5) The Dissolution of the Hard Problem. We extend this foundation with a theory of "Experiential Sets," which resolves the combination problem and addresses the phylogenetic threshold of consciousness. The theory generates testable predictions in neuroscience and artificial intelligence, including the "Cyborg Test" for substrate-independent consciousness. This is the initially published version of the article.Keywords:consciousness, hard problem, panpsychism, panexperientialism, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17354698
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computational Experiential Monism (CEM): Dissolving the Hard Problem of Consciousness

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Computational Experiential Monism (CEM): Dissolving the Hard Problem of Consciousness

article en

Abstract

This article presents a novel panexperientialist-computational theory that dissolves the "hard problem" of consciousness. We argue that subjective experience is not an emergent product of matter, but its intrinsic nature (The Identity Postulate). The hard problem arises from a categorical error: the projection of a "marker of inertness"—a cognitive heuristic that models the world as non-experiential—onto the brain itself. The framework is built on five core postulates: (1) Experience-Matter Identity, (2) The Marker of Inertness, (3) Phenomenal Specificity by Pattern, (4) Ownership Attribution Algorithms, and (5) The Dissolution of the Hard Problem. We extend this foundation with a theory of "Experiential Sets," which resolves the combination problem and addresses the phylogenetic threshold of consciousness. The theory generates testable predictions in neuroscience and artificial intelligence, including the "Cyborg Test" for substrate-independent consciousness. This is the initially published version of the article.Keywords:consciousness, hard problem, panpsychism, panexperientialism, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.