DIVERGING PATHS: HIRING IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS

This study investigates the differences in recruitment and selection practices between public and private sector organizations in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The research aims to explore the extent to which sectoral characteristics influence the adoption of traditional and contemporary hiring techniques and the mediating role of formal human resource (HR) departments in these processes. Data were collected through the CRANET survey conducted in 2021–2022, encompassing responses from 151 organizations, including 119 private and 32 public sector entities. The study employs non-parametric statistical methods, including the Mann-Whitney U test, to compare hiring practices and a three-step regression analysis to examine the mediating effect of HR departments. The results reveal significant sectoral differences in recruitment and selection techniques, with public sector organizations demonstrating a greater reliance on traditional methods, while private sector organizations adopt contemporary techniques more frequently. The presence and influence of formal HR departments partially mediate the relationship between sector and hiring practices, particularly in the adoption of structured and innovative hiring methods. These findings align with theoretical frameworks of sectoral differentiation and highlight the critical role of institutional factors in shaping HR practices. Furthermore, findings contribute to the understanding of HR practices in transitional economies and provide a basis for further research into additional mediators, such as organizational culture and leadership, that may influence hiring strategies in public and private sectors.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EMC Review - Časopis za ekonomiju - APEIRON
Published
2025-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7251/emc2501031p
Primary Topic
Employer Branding and e-HRM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DIVERGING PATHS: HIRING IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS

EMC Review - Časopis za ekonomiju - APEIRON
Employer Branding and e-HRM
article

DIVERGING PATHS: HIRING IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS

article en

Abstract

This study investigates the differences in recruitment and selection practices between public and private sector organizations in Serbia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. The research aims to explore the extent to which sectoral characteristics influence the adoption of traditional and contemporary hiring techniques and the mediating role of formal human resource (HR) departments in these processes. Data were collected through the CRANET survey conducted in 2021–2022, encompassing responses from 151 organizations, including 119 private and 32 public sector entities. The study employs non-parametric statistical methods, including the Mann-Whitney U test, to compare hiring practices and a three-step regression analysis to examine the mediating effect of HR departments. The results reveal significant sectoral differences in recruitment and selection techniques, with public sector organizations demonstrating a greater reliance on traditional methods, while private sector organizations adopt contemporary techniques more frequently. The presence and influence of formal HR departments partially mediate the relationship between sector and hiring practices, particularly in the adoption of structured and innovative hiring methods. These findings align with theoretical frameworks of sectoral differentiation and highlight the critical role of institutional factors in shaping HR practices. Furthermore, findings contribute to the understanding of HR practices in transitional economies and provide a basis for further research into additional mediators, such as organizational culture and leadership, that may influence hiring strategies in public and private sectors.

EMC Review - Časopis za ekonomiju - APEIRONVol. 29(1)
University of Novi Sad (RS), University of Banja Luka (BA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Employer Branding and e-HRM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.