ISSUES OF DETERMINING A LEXICAL MINIMUM FOR THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL

This article investigates the identification of essential lexical units necessary for elementary-level instruction in the Kazakh language at the university level, in accordance with state language proficiency standards. To achieve this objective, textbooks designed for A1-level instruction at universities are analyzed, with particular attention given to the frequency of 800 lexical units. The study further evaluates the lexical minimum required for Kazakh as a foreign language to ensure its alignment with the competencies that students are expected to acquire at the initial stage of language learning. Additionally, both theoretical and practical foundations are refined to align with established language standards. The primary aim of this research is to determine the fundamental lexical units essential for elementary-level proficiency in the Kazakh language through a systematic analysis of educational materials used at the A1 level in university settings. The study addresses the issue of defining a lexical minimum in university textbooks, assessing the frequency and thematic distribution of 800 lexical units critical for developing proficiency at the elementary level. Moreover, the research identifies the challenges students encounter in acquiring specific vocabulary, proposes effective solutions, and recommends updates to the lexical minimum. The research methodology incorporates data collection, lexical analysis, frequency analysis, and thematic analysis. The practical significance of this study lies in its capacity to identify the most fundamental and frequently used lexical units, ensuring their inclusion in educational materials. This, in turn, facilitates the development of students’ communicative competencies and serves as a foundational resource for the creation of high-quality textbooks and instructional materials. The issue of the lexical minimum in university textbooks has not been addressed until now. This article aims to fill this gap and helps provide learners with specific language material. During the research, methods such as data collection, lexical analysis, frequency analysis, and comparative analysis were used. The research results and main recommendations will make it possible to identify the most essential and frequently used lexical minimum that should be included in educational materials, as well as help develop the necessary communicative skills in students. This will serve as a guideline for the development of high-quality textbooks and teaching aids.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Tiltanym
Published
2025-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2025-3-105-121
Primary Topic
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ISSUES OF DETERMINING A LEXICAL MINIMUM FOR THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL

Tiltanym
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
article

ISSUES OF DETERMINING A LEXICAL MINIMUM FOR THE ELEMENTARY LEVEL

article en

Abstract

This article investigates the identification of essential lexical units necessary for elementary-level instruction in the Kazakh language at the university level, in accordance with state language proficiency standards. To achieve this objective, textbooks designed for A1-level instruction at universities are analyzed, with particular attention given to the frequency of 800 lexical units. The study further evaluates the lexical minimum required for Kazakh as a foreign language to ensure its alignment with the competencies that students are expected to acquire at the initial stage of language learning. Additionally, both theoretical and practical foundations are refined to align with established language standards. The primary aim of this research is to determine the fundamental lexical units essential for elementary-level proficiency in the Kazakh language through a systematic analysis of educational materials used at the A1 level in university settings. The study addresses the issue of defining a lexical minimum in university textbooks, assessing the frequency and thematic distribution of 800 lexical units critical for developing proficiency at the elementary level. Moreover, the research identifies the challenges students encounter in acquiring specific vocabulary, proposes effective solutions, and recommends updates to the lexical minimum. The research methodology incorporates data collection, lexical analysis, frequency analysis, and thematic analysis. The practical significance of this study lies in its capacity to identify the most fundamental and frequently used lexical units, ensuring their inclusion in educational materials. This, in turn, facilitates the development of students’ communicative competencies and serves as a foundational resource for the creation of high-quality textbooks and instructional materials. The issue of the lexical minimum in university textbooks has not been addressed until now. This article aims to fill this gap and helps provide learners with specific language material. During the research, methods such as data collection, lexical analysis, frequency analysis, and comparative analysis were used. The research results and main recommendations will make it possible to identify the most essential and frequently used lexical minimum that should be included in educational materials, as well as help develop the necessary communicative skills in students. This will serve as a guideline for the development of high-quality textbooks and teaching aids.

Tiltanym(3)
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ), Institute of Linguistics (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Second Language Acquisition and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.