Optimising supercritical CO2 saturation and reservoir conditions for geological energy storage with transcritical carbon dioxide systems

The CO 2 -based Electrothermal Energy and Geological Storage (CEEGS) system integrates energy storage with CO 2 sequestration by storing excess renewable energy as supercritical CO 2 , which is back-produced for power generation. This study investigates reservoir (porosity, permeability, relative permeability, heterogeneity, anisotropy) and operational (injection rates, shut-in periods) parameters to maximise CO 2 saturation near the wellbore and minimise water co-production, critical for the energy storage capacity and operation of the surface transcritical CO 2 power cycles. Using CMG-STARS and CMOST-AI, we conducted a sensitivity analysis across injection rates (5–100 kg/s), porosity (0.05–0.25), permeability (10–1000 mD), and heterogeneity (C.V. 0.1–1.5). Results show that injection rates of 30–40 kg/s, porosity of 0.05–0.15, and low heterogeneity (C.V. <0.25) achieve gas saturation up o 76 % with water production below 0.1 kg/s. Shut-in periods should not exceed 3 months to limit saturation losses. These findings provide a robust framework for optimising the CEEGS site selection and operation definition, ensuring supercritical CO 2 back production with adequate characteristics for efficient energy storage and operation. • Numerical simulations evaluate reservoir parameters impact on CO 2 saturation in CEEGS • Sensitivity analysis explores porosity, permeability, and injection rates for CEEGS • Low heterogeneity (C.V. <0.25) ensures high CO2 saturation in CEEGS reservoirs • CO2 injection rates of 30–40 kg/s optimise gas saturation in CEEGS systems • Shut-in periods over 3 months increase water production, reduce CEEGS efficiency

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Energy Storage
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.118924
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimising supercritical CO2 saturation and reservoir conditions for geological energy storage with transcritical carbon dioxide systems

Journal of Energy Storage
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Optimising supercritical CO2 saturation and reservoir conditions for geological energy storage with transcritical carbon dioxide systems

article en

Abstract

The CO 2 -based Electrothermal Energy and Geological Storage (CEEGS) system integrates energy storage with CO 2 sequestration by storing excess renewable energy as supercritical CO 2 , which is back-produced for power generation. This study investigates reservoir (porosity, permeability, relative permeability, heterogeneity, anisotropy) and operational (injection rates, shut-in periods) parameters to maximise CO 2 saturation near the wellbore and minimise water co-production, critical for the energy storage capacity and operation of the surface transcritical CO 2 power cycles. Using CMG-STARS and CMOST-AI, we conducted a sensitivity analysis across injection rates (5–100 kg/s), porosity (0.05–0.25), permeability (10–1000 mD), and heterogeneity (C.V. 0.1–1.5). Results show that injection rates of 30–40 kg/s, porosity of 0.05–0.15, and low heterogeneity (C.V. <0.25) achieve gas saturation up o 76 % with water production below 0.1 kg/s. Shut-in periods should not exceed 3 months to limit saturation losses. These findings provide a robust framework for optimising the CEEGS site selection and operation definition, ensuring supercritical CO 2 back production with adequate characteristics for efficient energy storage and operation. • Numerical simulations evaluate reservoir parameters impact on CO 2 saturation in CEEGS • Sensitivity analysis explores porosity, permeability, and injection rates for CEEGS • Low heterogeneity (C.V. <0.25) ensures high CO2 saturation in CEEGS reservoirs • CO2 injection rates of 30–40 kg/s optimise gas saturation in CEEGS systems • Shut-in periods over 3 months increase water production, reduce CEEGS efficiency

Journal of Energy StorageVol. 139
University of Évora (PT), Instituto Geológico y Minero de España (ES), Fundação de Ciência e Tecnologia (BR), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR), Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.